To avoid dispute over resource distribution, organise a structured gathering to openly discuss issues. Clearly define the project's objectives and restrictions. Encourage team members to share their ideas and provide solutions. Use facts and objective standards to assess possibilities. Seek agreement via collaborative decision-making while prioritising the project's overall success. If necessary, use a neutral mediator to help smooth the discussion. Document the agreed-upon allocation strategy and track its execution. This strategy assures a fair and transparent procedure, which promotes team alignment and project success.

Facilitate a fact-based discussion to align the team on project priorities. Use data and shared objectives to guide decisions. Encourage compromise and collaboration, ensuring everyone feels heard while aligning resources for maximum impact.

as a leader in an organization, when your team is having disagreements over resource allocation for a project, it is important to approach this conflict with an approach that promotes long-term human capital value by holding open discussions that engage all team members to understand each other's perspectives, identify priorities that align with the organization's vision, and create solutions that not only meet the current needs of the project but also empower team members to thrive and contribute to its full potential in the future.

When faced with conflict among team members regarding asset allocation I’ve found it best to ask why each person feels their ideas could be most beneficial to the project. We would consider each person’s thoughts and then apply each to the project to find which is most beneficial.