You're facing pushback on database schema changes from developers. How do you navigate the conflict?
Facing resistance from developers on database schema changes can be challenging, but it’s crucial to address it constructively. Here’s how to navigate this conflict:
- Open dialogue: Initiate a conversation to understand their concerns and explain the reasons behind the changes.
- Collaborative planning: Work together to find a compromise that satisfies both performance needs and development constraints.
- Transparent testing: Share test results and data to demonstrate the benefits and mitigate fears about potential issues.
How do you handle pushback on technical changes? Share your strategies.
You're facing pushback on database schema changes from developers. How do you navigate the conflict?
Facing resistance from developers on database schema changes can be challenging, but it’s crucial to address it constructively. Here’s how to navigate this conflict:
- Open dialogue: Initiate a conversation to understand their concerns and explain the reasons behind the changes.
- Collaborative planning: Work together to find a compromise that satisfies both performance needs and development constraints.
- Transparent testing: Share test results and data to demonstrate the benefits and mitigate fears about potential issues.
How do you handle pushback on technical changes? Share your strategies.
-
Sometimes, developers may take easy paths while designing a schema. This is where the developers unknowingly get into the world of complex workarounds. For example, a "SELECT FOR UPDATE" to lock a row for each transaction, compared to the planning upfront in using Advisory locks in PostgreSQL. One of the famous issues is related to integers reaching its limits. This is where the data type has to be altered to a bigint to avoid potential impact. This is where, as a DBA, it is important to show metrics of how the integers are being consumed and what you estimate as the time before it is out of its range.Proving through performance benchmarks, past statistics and relevant data points, can always convince developers in approving schema changes.
-
To navigate conflict over database schema changes with developers: 1. Communicate Early: Involve developers in discussions about schema changes from the start to address concerns proactively. 2. Explain the Why: Clearly articulate the reasons for the changes, focusing on how they benefit performance, scalability, or usability. 3. Provide Testing Environments: Offer safe testing environments where developers can evaluate the impact of changes without risking production. 4. Collaborate on Solutions: Seek input from developers to co-create solutions that balance both database and application needs. 5. Adopt Change Management: Use formal processes and tools to document, review, and approve changes collaboratively.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
SQL DB2What are some common pitfalls to avoid when designing DB2 indexes?
-
Database AdministrationWhat are the best practices for handling query errors in a high-availability environment?
-
SQL DB2How do you write a correlated subquery in DB2 and when is it useful?
-
T-SQL Stored ProceduresHow do you design and implement table-valued parameters in stored procedures for complex scenarios?