You need to fix performance issues while adding new features. How do you find the right balance?
Balancing new features with performance fixes is tricky. How do you approach it?
You need to fix performance issues while adding new features. How do you find the right balance?
Balancing new features with performance fixes is tricky. How do you approach it?
-
Balancing new features with performance fixes is tricky. I approach it by prioritizing tasks based on impact - ensuring critical performance bottlenecks are addressed first while integrating new features efficiently. I use profiling tools to identify key performance issues and optimize them without disrupting development velocity. Feature development follows best practices, ensuring scalability and minimal technical debt. I also advocate for incremental performance improvements within each sprint, rather than deferring them. Clear communication with stakeholders helps align expectations, ensuring both product growth and a seamless user experience.
-
Balancing performance fixes with building new features is challenging. It starts with understanding what truly impacts users. Sometimes, it’s smarter to fix what slows them down the most, while other times, shipping that new feature matters more. It’s all about finding the sweet spot and staying flexible.
-
Balancing performance fixes with new features is all about prioritization and strategy. I start by using data to identify which performance issues truly impact user experience or scalability — not all slowdowns are worth fixing immediately. We also reserve a small percentage of each sprint specifically for tech debt and performance improvements. This keeps progress steady without neglecting system health. Finally, I ensure clear communication with stakeholders, showing how performance impacts user satisfaction and long-term agility. When performance is seen as an enabler, not a blocker, finding the balance becomes much easier.
-
Identifying Bottlenecks - Look for highly impactful performance hindrances. Those will need to be dealt with immediately and must be some of the top priorities. Prioritizing certain new features - Some features may be more useful than others, and can be implemented more efficiently and without hindering the user base. Those are the features that must be prioritized. Incremental development - Fix the bottlenecks and performance issues, while testing repeatedly and thoroughly to ensure functionality. With these fixes implemented and tested, push them and begin work on the new features. Continuously test for performance concerns and functionality, and upon passing all relevant QA assessments, release the new features.
-
Prioritize a phased approach. First, analyze performance bottlenecks with profiling tools to pinpoint critical issues. Address the most impactful fixes concurrently with the early stages of feature development. Implement performance monitoring to track changes and prevent regressions. Integrate performance testing into the development pipeline. Use feature flags to roll out new functionalities gradually, allowing for real-time performance evaluation. Communicate transparently with stakeholders, explaining the trade-offs and prioritizing long-term stability. The goal is to build features with performance as a core consideration, not an afterthought.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Operating SystemsYou're an executive in Operating Systems. What do you need to develop the most?
-
Reliability EngineeringHow do you validate and verify the results and assumptions of an ALT?
-
IT ServicesHow do you calculate the mean time between failures (MTBF) in incident response?
-
Operating SystemsHow can you manage clients with unrealistic expectations for Operating Systems?