How do you collaborate with developers and product owners to define acceptance criteria for user stories?

Review user story and project documentation for context. Schedule a meeting with stakeholders. Clearly outline the purpose of defining acceptance criteria. Schedule a meeting with stakeholders. Clearly outline the purpose of defining acceptance criteria. Clearly articulate success criteria as a benchmark for completion Prioritize acceptance criteria based on importance and impact. Document the agreed-upon acceptance criteria in a shared space. Validate the criteria with the entire team Emphasize ongoing communication to accommodate changes or updates throughout the development process.

In my team, INVEST criteria is the DOR. Indeed, testable (T) for our QA means: - Acceptance criteria are written in Gherkin language (Given, When, Then) - Data set is identifiable for testing purposes - Test environment is operational

Imagine a user story is like a recipe. To ensure a delicious cake, you need to understand the ingredients and steps. Similarly, in software, understanding the user's needs is crucial. Ask questions and give feedback to make sure everyone is on the same page.

Collaborating with developers and product owners on acceptance criteria involves joint planning, clarifying ambiguities, and refining user stories. Incorporate edge cases, assess testability, and discuss automation possibilities. Maintain continuous communication, conduct regular reviews, and ensure alignment with the Definition of Done. Establish a feedback loop for addressing changes promptly, fostering a collaborative environment throughout development.

All the requirements should be clear with all stakeholders by regular meetings, regular review progress & also discuss the output/product received after completion of process. Freeze pass/fail criteria.

Always read the user story to understand the context and what it is going to achieve. Have regular meetings that involve the QAs, Devs and the Product Owner to align the acceptance criteria with the definition of done. Ask questions wherever necessary. Have a feedback system in place and review changes constantly. Collaboration is the key!

Think of the user story as a map. Define the main features and functions it covers, like marking important locations. Consider non-functional aspects like performance or security as road conditions. Tools like ATDD (Acceptance Test-Driven development) or BDD (Behavioral-Driven Development) help draw a clear map, making testing easier.

Understand the Requirement(EPIC, US's). Always understand the US requirement as per the customer/user's expectation. Have review connects with responsible stake holders like PO's, TBA's to have clear picture of what needs to be done. Conduct regular review meetings with everyone involved in feature development(PO's, TBA's, Developers & QA's) to asses the gaps and address it. Keep updating the Test cases with new scenarios. Maintaining static set of tests will miss out the bugs.

Defining the scope and boundaries involves outlining main features, functions, and interactions of the user story, along with non-functional requirements like performance and security. We identify exceptions, errors, and edge cases. Tools like ATDD, BDD, or SBE aid in articulating these aspects in a testable format, ensuring clear understanding and execution. 🎯🛠️ #ScopeDefinitionQA

Imagine the "Definition of Done" as a checklist for a completed puzzle. Each piece must fit perfectly. Collaborate to check if acceptance criteria meet this checklist. Ensure standards in coding, testing, and documentation, making sure the puzzle is ready for delivery.

Aligning acceptance criteria with the Definition of Done (DoD) is crucial. The DoD sets standards for consistency, completeness, and readiness for delivery, encompassing aspects like code quality, documentation, and testing. Collaborating with the product owner and developers ensures alignment and identifies any gaps or conflicts, ensuring the user story meets all requirements before delivery. 🤝✅ #DoDAlignmentQA

Think of acceptance criteria like a rough sketch. Collaborate to turn it into a detailed masterpiece. Review with peers, gather user feedback, and refine the criteria. Use checklists and guidelines to ensure clarity. Prioritize based on importance, just like focusing on crucial details in art.

Reviewing and refining acceptance criteria involves collaboration with the product owner and developers. Techniques like peer review, user feedback, and prototyping validate and enhance criteria. Utilize tools such as checklists and guidelines to ensure clarity and consistency. Prioritize criteria based on importance, complexity, and risk, ensuring alignment with project goals. 🔄🔍 #AcceptanceCriteriaRefinementQA

Imagine acceptance criteria as a script for a play. To ensure a flawless performance, automate tests using tools like Cucumber or Selenium. Integrate them into the CI/CD pipeline, similar to rehearsals before the big show. Tools like TestRail track the performance, helping to spot and fix any issues.

Acceptance criteria should GUIDE tester and his/her thinking. That is, there may be several tests per each criteria, not just one. Final step is NOT to automate tests, but to use criteria to help in exploring the use case; to get test ideas; to model the wanted behavior and explore the product. Tester can utilize any tools, not just test automation, to gain infomatin about quality and risks and select tests to be automated (and executed later on).

Automating and executing acceptance criteria involves using tools like Cucumber, Selenium, or JUnit to create automated tests. Integration with CI/CD pipelines ensures continuous testing. Test management tools such as TestRail, Jira, or Trello help track results and status. Collaborate with the product owner and developers to address any issues or defects identified during testing promptly. 🤖🔧 #AutomatedTestingQA

Testers may reveal more acceptance criteria while they test. That is, amount of acceptance criteria and tests is known after testing.

In addition to the outlined steps, fostering a culture of continuous improvement is essential. Encouraging feedback loops and retrospectives after each iteration helps identify areas for enhancement in the collaboration process and testing practices. Moreover, investing in ongoing training and skill development for team members ensures they stay updated with the latest tools and techniques in Agile testing. Emphasizing the importance of communication and transparency across the team further enhances collaboration and ensures everyone is aligned with project goals. Lastly, celebrating successes and milestones boosts team morale and reinforces a positive working environment. 🌟🔄 #ContinuousImprovementQA