ArenaEV.com ArenaEV.com

A new study shows how bad touchscreen-centric car controls are for road safety

  • Post your comment
  • Comments (7)

Ro, 17 August 2026

Other

In the last decade or so, screens have become an inseparable part of modern-day vehicles, but at some point, the pendulum has swung a bit too far. Nowadays, drivers are complaining about complicated UI and touch controls to perform simple tasks like adjusting the AC or even changing the radio station. And according to a study conducted by Vi Bilägare, it's not just the drivers. The data shows that screen distractions in a car are becoming worse.

A new study shows how touchscreen-centric car controls are detrimental for road safety

The first study was carried out in 2022 and found that drivers spend a surprising amount of time interacting with the screen while driving. The testing scenario required drivers to adjust the AC settings, change radio stations and alter the display brightness while moving at highway speeds on a closed airfield. Of course, the drivers were asked to get familiar with the car's specific settings before the test in order to replicate a real car owner's experience. The results were measured in the time it took to complete a single task as well as the car's distance traveled while adjusting the said settings.

This year, the same study was conducted with the same exact testing methodology for consistency. In 2022, the average distance traveled while completing tasks was about 2,480 ft, while in 2026, that figure is 2,667 ft. In other words, it took the drivers two extra seconds to complete the same tasks under the same conditions four years later.

Just to put those numbers into context, back in 2005, the Volvo V70 was criticized for having complicated media control buttons and cluttered controls on the dashboard, and the average time for completing these tasks was 945 ft. So it's clear that we have an issue on our hands.

The study found that Mazda was the worst offender, with the CX-60 requiring 3,730 ft to complete all tasks, despite the company advertising safety and ease of use of its infotainment system.

Volvo sits on the other end of the spectrum with a score of 1,591 ft in the same test. Audi is also taking the issue seriously and aims to bring back hardware controls for the most commonly used features. Another way to tackle this is to move the infotainment screen up on the dashboard, which reduces the distraction time for drivers, the study shows.

Source

This article contains localized units and prices. Change settings.
Related articles
  • Geely Galaxy TT - another electric sedan from China Geely Galaxy TT - another electric sedan from China
  • The first all-electric BMW iX5 is now official, comes alongside four other powertrain options The first all-electric BMW iX5 is now official, comes alongside four other powertrain options
  • Land Rover readying another full-electric vehicle, likely a Velar successor Land Rover readying another full-electric vehicle, likely a Velar successor
  • Xiaomi is on a roll with another 40,000 sales month Xiaomi is on a roll with another 40,000 sales month

Reader comments

J
  • JrJ
  • L2s
  • 23 Aug 2026

Me either, would be fine without humongus or big tablet or without at all.

  • Reply
J
  • JrJ
  • L2s
  • 23 Aug 2026

Sorry not, it's disturbing if the car has humongus or big tablet in the middle.

  • Reply
J
  • Jewfro
  • Ibx
  • 18 Aug 2026

Very surprised to see Volve so low. I thought most of their newer lineup was basically a tablet bolted to the dashboard

  • Reply
  • Read all comments
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 7

  • Home
  • Compare
  • News
  • Terms
  • Reviews
  • About us
  • Tesla
  • Volkswagen
  • Audi
  • Porsche
  • BMW
  • Mercedes
  • Hyundai
  • Kia
  • Renault
  • Nissan
  • Dacia
  • Ford
  • Jeep
  • Volvo
  • Polestar
  • Zeekr
  • Jaguar
  • Mini
  • Toyota
  • Mazda
  • MG
  • Voyah
  • Lucid
  • Rivian
  • Cadillac
  • Chevrolet
  • GMC
  • RAM
  • Subaru
  • Nio
  • Xpeng
  • BYD
  • All brands

EV finder

ADVERTISEMENTS

Latest models

  • ModelBentley
    Torcal
  • ModelVolkswagen
    ID.3 GTI
  • ModelDacia
    Spring
  • ModelAudi
    A2 e-tron 240 kW 84 kWh
  • ModelPolestar
    4 SUV Dual Motor
  • ModelMercedes
    AMG GT 53 4-Door Coupé 4MATIC+

Featured

  • Comparison of NEDC, EPA and WLTP cycles Comparison of NEDC, EPA and WLTP cycles
  • How big is the “fuel tank” of an EV? How big is the “fuel tank” of an EV?
  • Here's a breakdown of the cost of an EV battery Here's a breakdown of the cost of an EV battery
  • Peugeot e-208 tops 84 cars in ADAC's 2024 Ecotest, Model 3 ranks fourth Peugeot e-208 tops 84 cars in ADAC's 2024 Ecotest, Model 3 ranks fourth
  • Different types of electric motors used in EVs Different types of electric motors used in EVs

Reviews

  • BMW iX2 xDrive30 review BMW iX2 xDrive30 review
  • Fiat 500e review Fiat 500e review
  • Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic review Mercedes-Benz EQE AMG 43 4Matic review
  • Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD review Hyundai Ioniq 6 LR AWD review
ADVERTISEMENTS

Home News Compare About us RSS feed Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2022-2026 ArenaEV.com Mobile version EV Finder Glossary Privacy Terms of use

From the team behind
GSMArena.com