Timeline for answer to A form of MAD that doesn't involve a huge amount of nuclear readiness? by durandal
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2016 at 23:36 | comment | added | durandal | @philipp 1. Family ties; the wive's new husbands would be going to war against the wive's fathers. 2. If you'd manage to do that (who says the men wouldn't get locked up in stead) you'd get an unstable population yourself as your women wouldn't want to procreate 3. The enemy society would do the same. It's a women-swap. | |
| Dec 23, 2016 at 22:22 | comment | added | Philipp | 1. what ensures that these women stay loyal to their birth-society and not become loyal to their new husbands? 2. Even if they someone manage to do that, what stops the enemy society from detaining all the women in concentration camps before attacking? 3. How would the first society maintain a stable population when they send most of their women away? | |
| Dec 23, 2016 at 20:49 | history | answered | durandal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |