Timeline for answer to Could a nation feasibly hide its early wartime use of nuclear weapons during World War 2? by Kilisi
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 at 13:00 | comment | added | Kilisi | @MontyWild now you're just making scenarios up to bolster yourself with. Just downvote if you think it's a bad answer, we can make up scenarios either way forever. | |
| Dec 18, 2025 at 11:03 | comment | added | Monty Wild♦ | The trouble is that failing to eliminate every person on the target vessels immediately would leave bodies or survivors with the unmistakable signs of radiation sickness, and the vessels themselves would also be highly irradiated. While the bodies might eventually disappear, the sunken vessels, or more critically, any that were exposed but not sunken, would be a give-away. | |
| Dec 18, 2025 at 9:42 | comment | added | Kilisi | @MontyWild it's the ocean, not a bathtub. It doesn't stay in one place for long and the place it is in for a short time is not accessible. Seems common sense to me. | |
| Dec 18, 2025 at 3:36 | comment | added | Monty Wild♦ | So that much radiation makes it not exactly secret. | |
| Dec 17, 2025 at 7:34 | comment | added | Kilisi | @MontyWild so what?.................. | |
| Dec 17, 2025 at 4:38 | comment | added | Monty Wild♦ | Uh... no. Nuking seawater gets you heaps of very radioactive sodium. | |
| Dec 16, 2025 at 1:20 | history | answered | Kilisi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |