Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "Critical mass" is a misnomer; what really matters is critical density. (Well, actually, critical neutron impact cross-section, but density is much easier to say.) You can cause a sub-critical mass to go critical by compressing it. It's a deeply implausible scenario for any number of reasons but its nuclear physics is hardly the worst offender. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 25, 2021 at 23:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Cadence What really matters is the chance a neutron hits a fissile atom. That is both a function of density (reduces the chance it goes between atoms) and mass (more atoms in it's path to hit.) Note that causing detonation by compression isn't implausible--look at a Teller-Ulam H--bomb design. In addition to the trigger there's a separate plutonium rod inside the lithium deutride. It's compressed by the fury of the nuclear detonation inches away and detonates, setting off the now-compressed lithium deutride. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 26, 2021 at 3:52