Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 2, 2022 at 3:53 vote accept KEY_ABRADE
Dec 26, 2021 at 1:27 comment added Michael frame challenge: whoever is being attacked gets wise to this loophole and it's quickly closed as nobody likes getting nuked with a 20 ton warhead every day by somebody who thinks they can just get away with it because it's technically not illegal.
Dec 25, 2021 at 18:49 answer added Willk timeline score: 4
Dec 25, 2021 at 13:41 history became hot network question
Dec 25, 2021 at 12:29 answer added Trioxidane timeline score: 7
Dec 25, 2021 at 10:05 answer added John Dallman timeline score: 7
Dec 25, 2021 at 7:15 comment added Cadence Why is the attacker continuing a constant bombardment when it clearly isn't working? Why not, for instance, switch to attacking the (presumably unshielded) farms supplying these indestructible cities?
Dec 25, 2021 at 6:02 history edited KEY_ABRADE CC BY-SA 4.0
added 3 characters in body
Dec 25, 2021 at 5:49 history edited KEY_ABRADE CC BY-SA 4.0
added 11 characters in body
Dec 25, 2021 at 5:49 comment added KEY_ABRADE @L.Dutch In that case, this is an urban fortress.
Dec 25, 2021 at 5:41 comment added L.Dutch I think your question is an oxymoron: something designed to be livable under constant attack is not called an urban area, is called a fortress and is made of bunkers.
Dec 25, 2021 at 5:24 history asked KEY_ABRADE CC BY-SA 4.0