Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If I follow correctly, the upshot is that the rate of spontaneous radioactive decay suddenly increases. If the existing nuclear weapons don't go bang immediately, doesn't this just mean that they turn into duds faster? If you have time to dismantle the nukes, you don't need to. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 11, 2020 at 16:01
  • $\begingroup$ @NuclearHoagie - I'll happily admit to being no scientist, so you may be right; however, the problem is the uncertainty over weapons that are now getting spontaneously hot all by themselves. If that didn't make people start dismantling them, I'm not sure anything else would. With the warhead material becoming much more radioactive all of a sudden, I certainly wouldn't trust the machinery and containers it was in to remain unaffected and secure. And if we assume an alternate Earth in a completely simulated universe, I think a little suspension of scientific veracity is the least of my problems. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 12, 2020 at 12:22