Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

9
  • $\begingroup$ But fusion power is also unreliable now, which means all the future space stuff OP wants might not come to fruition. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 13, 2019 at 22:06
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @fredsbend Why would fusion power be unreliable? Fusion depends on internuclear collisions, rather than neutron flux, so slowing neutrons and forcing them to emit their energy as photons actually makes fusion power more usable, because you don't have to have blankets of low-density material to capture high-energy neutrons. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 13, 2019 at 22:10
  • $\begingroup$ I meant fission. Autocorrect fubar. We're currently using fission reactors in many of our massive war machines. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 13, 2019 at 22:13
  • $\begingroup$ Stable and safe fusion would have to be invented concurrently, to replace the unreliable fission. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 13, 2019 at 22:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ We have fusion bombs now. That's what thermonuclear weapons are. They require a fission initiator. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 13, 2019 at 22:18