트윗 전체 / 답글 없음

  1. 14분

    The evidence keeps coming that 's bulk collection is needless & threatens Americans' civil liberties

    님이 리트윗했습니다
    요약 보기 요약 숨기기
  2. 25분

    hard to avoid concluding Judge Walton's FISA Court opinion from March 09 remained classified for reason besides concealing NSA noncompliance

    Washington, DC에서 접기
  3. 33분

    "NSA's data accessing technologies & practices were never adequately designed to comply w/the governing [privacy protections]" FISA Court 09

    펼치기 접기
  4. 36분

    NSA repeatedly violated court rules on data protection, documents show ; new from me.

    요약 보기 요약 숨기기
  5. 44분

    I'll have a piece soon, but docs suggest FISA Court in 09 lost so much confidence in NSA that it Q'd the overall value of bulk phone records

    펼치기 접기
  6. 1시간

    It adds nuance to descriptions of the court as a "rubber stamp." Angered by violations; laments lacking power to adequately remedy situation

    펼치기 접기
  7. 1시간

    Relevant dynamic from FISA Court revealed/deepened in these documents: Court warnings that it is at the mercy of NSA misrepresentations.

    펼치기 접기
  8. 2시간

    Russ Feingold, try not to let your head explode from the irony in this document.

    펼치기 접기
  9. 2시간

    Now-chief FISA Court judge Reggie Walton grappled with whether Patriot Act let really NSA get bulk phone metadata.

    펼치기 접기
  10. 3시간

    so if that's accurate, it would mean NSA gave about 4600 phone numbers to FBI since May 2006.

    펼치기 접기
  11. 3시간

    From FISA Court's '06 order authorizing bulk phone metadata collection: NSA told the Court it expected to give FBI 2 phone numbers per day.

    펼치기 접기
  12. 3시간

    In response to an FOIA, a new sheaf of declassified NSA documents:

    펼치기 접기
  13. 3시간

    My favorite thing today is 's foodie enthusiasm.

    펼치기 접기
  14. 3시간

    Anticipated obstacle: Syrian rebels, who are ironically/justifiably suspicious that dealing w Assad's chemicals will end the US' attention.

    펼치기 접기
  15. 3시간

    Good point from : it's problematic to transfer chemical weapons, even for destruction, during a war

    펼치기 접기
  16. 4시간

    And you all laughed at me when I sanded off my fingerprints.

    펼치기 접기
  17. 4시간

    Also, I want 's money in advance from the column he'll write on this

    펼치기 접기
  18. 4시간

    We don't want passwords. We don't want biometrics to replace them. We want data security. We have no idea how to properly provide it yet.

    펼치기 접기
  19. 4시간

    Verified destruction is the issue RT : BREAKING: Kerry says Syria should "go further" than declaring chemical weapons, signing treaty

    펼치기 접기
  20. 5시간

    Kerry says it's possible that the US strikes might yield "some retaliation somewhere, in an asymmetrical way." Not deterred by that.

    펼치기 접기

@attackerman 님은 아직 트윗이 없습니다.

로딩하는데 시간이 지연되고 있습니다.

트위터에 트래픽이 과열되었거나 일시적인 문제가 발생하였습니다. 재시도하거나 자세한 내용은 트위터 시스템 현황을 참조하세요.