The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20070128002841/http://www.pcworld.com:80/article/id,128346-page,1/article.html
Read More About: Vista/Longhorn (246)

No Rush to Adopt Vista

Software compatibility issues, bug worries keep businesses from moving to Microsoft's new OS.

Robert McMillan and Elizabeth Montalbano, IDG News Service

Thursday, December 28, 2006 07:00 AM PST

Windows Vista has been on the market for nearly a month now, but enterprise users and industry experts agree that Microsoft's latest and greatest OS still isn't yet ready to replace XP.

The problem is not with the software itself--by most accounts, Vista is technically solid--but with myriad peripheral issues that Microsoft must work out to take the pain out of using Vista.

Microsoft Holding Off on Vista Patches

Take patching, for example. On December 12, Microsoft released an Internet Explorer 7 fix that improved the performance of IE's phishing filter. The software had been bogged down by Web sites with a large number of frames, and users had been complaining.

Microsoft patched the problem for Windows XP and Server 2003 users, but not for Vista. That update will come after the consumer release of Vista hits the market some time in January, according to a spokeswoman for Microsoft's public relations agency. And although Microsoft is now issuing security patches for Vista, performance-related updates such as the phishing filter are being handled on a case-by-case basis, she said.

Microsoft won't say why it is holding off on some Vista patches even though the product is commercially available for business customers, but Russ Cooper, a senior information security analyst at Cybertrust, has a theory.

"I say Microsoft never intended anybody to run Vista prior to January," he said. "What works on Vista, beyond Office 2007?" he asked. "I'm going to Vista ... when my VPN supplier tells me that they have drivers that work, and when my antivirus vendor tells me that they have non-beta versions that work."

Many Apps not Compatible

Cooper brings up a good point: Application compatibility is another problem for Vista, and VPN and antivirus software are among the applications at the top of the list that users say must work before they will move to Vista. Right now, the most popular software in those categories, as well as other mainstream applications many business customers use, won't be available for Vista until after the consumer version of the operating system is released on January 30, 2007.

Some of the applications that still aren't compatible with Vista include IBM Lotus Notes e-mail and collaboration suite; Cisco's and Check Point Software's VPN clients; Intuit's accounting software QuickBooks 2006 and earlier versions; and antivirus software from Trend Micro.

Intuit even took time in mid-December to warn QuickBooks users in a note that they should hold off on upgrading to Vista until after the U.S. tax season ends in April, citing compatibility with older versions of its software and "potential reliability issues" with Vista.

IBM said Lotus Notes will support Vista by mid-2007; Lotus Notes 8, the next version of the suite, also will be available at that time on Vista. Cisco's VPN will support Vista some time in the first quarter of 2007.

QuickBooks, Check Point's VPN client, and Symantec and Trend Micro's antivirus software will support Vista following the consumer release. However, in some good news for users, McAfee already has Vista antivirus software on the market.

Even some of Microsoft's own products still don't run on Vista. SQL Server 2005, the latest version of Microsoft's database, won't be available for Vista until after the consumer release.

Switch to Vista Inevitable

Still, while there may be some lag time in Vista adoption as users wait for applications to catch up to the new OS, companies will eventually have to make the switch to Vista no matter how painful it is. Most analysts predict that enterprises will begin moving over to Vista in earnest by 2008.

"Once Vista is being shipped by OEMs on all new PCs, we won't be debating why people should move," said Andrew Brust, chief of new technology with consulting firm TwentySix New York. "It will be clear that they will need to do so, sooner or later. And honestly, people can argue until they're blue in the face about how XP is fine, but the reality is that it's five years old, technology has changed, and a new OS is necessary."



Comments

Recent Discussions

small printer wanted HP 3920 Deskjet is The best! In India it costs $65.99 (Thats when I Bought it) It may be...
Epson Web-To-Page Problem I have an Epson RX700, using WinXP, IE6. When I first installed Web-To-Page several months...

Free Newsletters

Receive the latest reviews, how-to's, news, and more.
See all newsletters

PC World's Marketplace

PC World's Free Whitepapers

Enter your trial subscription and get 2 Risk-Free Issues plus Bonus CD-ROM. If you like PC WORLD, pay just $19.97 for 10 more issues (12 in all). Otherwise, write "cancel" on the bill, return it, and owe nothing. Added Bonus! You will also get PC World's Weekly Brief, a free e-mail newsletter.