Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • Unfortunately I use another font, but thanks for your answer! I didn't know about this, it's a nice feature of these fonts. Commented Apr 9, 2024 at 20:34
  • 2
    I've always asked myself why didn't Unicode managers ask some expert in mathematics before adding ridiculous code points for the same character. The difference between ≤ and ⩽ is purely a question of taste and preference, so the choice should be referred to character variants or stylistic sets. There's no way the two glyphs can represent different concepts. To the contrary, they refused to admit that Ş and Ș are different characters, until they eventually got convinced. Commented Apr 9, 2024 at 22:17
  • @egreg leqslant was added in unicode 3.2 as part of the stix submission spearheaded by elsevier and the ams:-) Commented Apr 10, 2024 at 23:00