Edit - Stack Overflow

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

My issue with this answer: it's perfectly reasonable to define a new class if the standard library doesn't fir you needs. However, you don't show us the implementation of your new class (to avoid the supposed bloat of the standard library version). Instead you tell us about a set of bizarre operator overloads that make this class behave like no other class in the world (negation for "size"!?).

DavidW
– DavidW

2022-08-12 07:14:21 +00:00
Commented Aug 12, 2022 at 7:14

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
indent code by 4 spaces
backtick escapes `like _so_`
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow