Timeline for Does a controlled mount share its rider's turn?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2020 at 18:20 | comment | added | Exempt-Medic | @illustro Ah, you could definitely turn that observation into a full answer | |
| Dec 15, 2020 at 13:19 | comment | added | illustro | @Medix2 The key sentence in the controlled mount section is "A controlled mount can move and act even on the turn that you mount it.". This pretty clearly makes it share your turn (as you are mounting the mount on your turn). | |
| Dec 15, 2020 at 13:13 | history | edited | T.J.L. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Removed quote block from non-quote.
|
| Aug 9, 2019 at 22:16 | comment | added | Exempt-Medic | Of note, there are times when creatures, instead of sharing initiative, share turns such as simulacrum or when true polymorphing an object into a creature. | |
| May 2, 2019 at 15:26 | comment | added | svenema | Say, Bob was knocked of his horse as a reaction (opportunity attack) by his target. Would a now unmounted Applejack, now back in 6th place, have all its movement regained when his turn comes up within this round? | |
| Mar 21, 2018 at 1:34 | comment | added | Rubiksmoose | @DavidCoffron see my answer. This is not at all what JC was saying here (though it is confusing). | |
| Mar 21, 2018 at 0:45 | comment | added | David Coffron | @SethR.Feldman They have separate but concurrent turns, but neither ends during the others turn. The turns overlap, see here (You could include this link Sebkha) | |
| Mar 19, 2018 at 23:03 | comment | added | Seth R. Feldman | This example above with Applejack is incorrect. Bob doesn't get to direct Applejack's movement the final 50 feet, as Bob already chose to end Applejack's turn and make his attack. Both the controlled mount and the rider have separate turns, per Jeremy Crawford (actually posted below as well). | |
| Mar 22, 2017 at 3:57 | history | bounty awarded | daze413 | ||
| Mar 20, 2017 at 1:39 | comment | added | daze413 | Related reading: Is initiative ordinal or numerical? | |
| Sep 24, 2015 at 3:31 | comment | added | Lost_in_Hyrule | Paul, yes, identical creatures share a single turn, acting at the same time. (Silly mobile editing...) I think an important point is that a mount can act "on the turn you mount it." A turn specifically refers to a creature's actions. If a mount moved in a separate turn from the rider, the language would have to read "round" rather than "turn" as it does. | |
| Sep 23, 2015 at 23:44 | comment | added | Paul Hutton | Does this mean that Multiple identical creatures under GM control can interleave their actions, too? Or is that specific to controlled mounts? | |
| Sep 5, 2015 at 5:47 | history | edited | Sebkha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added citation
|
| Sep 4, 2015 at 16:23 | history | edited | Sebkha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added note about controlled mount status ending.
|
| Sep 4, 2015 at 16:10 | history | answered | Sebkha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |