Timeline for Can an Otherworldly Steed use a readied action while acting as a controlled mount?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 hours ago | comment | added | SeriousBri | @nonymous honestly I let my mounts attack anyway, so yes this isn't terrible. | |
| 18 hours ago | comment | added | nonymous | As is, this is not terrible when it comes to shenanigans. Not much worse than the steed making an OA. | |
| 18 hours ago | comment | added | nonymous | @SeriousBri, “I think when an answer has to be described as RAW, you know you are into shenanigans.” I know what you mean. But, there is often a double standard of using RAW to justify totally illogical (neither verisimilitude nor mechanical soundness) restrictions on player choices. Shenanigans are the other end of the spectrum. A good GM should have a more interesting and sophisticated method of adjudicating than “This is RAW so send it!” | |
| 18 hours ago | comment | added | Thomas Markov | @SeriousBri It’s just important to remember that “RAW” is a method of interpretation, not an interpretation itself. There is no standard of RAW interpretation or expectation that any two people claiming to be using a RAW method should arrive at the same conclusion. We’re all just providing our own interpretation according to our own experiences and biases, and terms like RAW and RAI (intended, not interpreted) are just telling us something about how the individual is generally approaching the rules in a particular context. | |
| 22 hours ago | comment | added | SeriousBri | I think when an answer has to be described as RAW, you know you are into shenanigans. This might be technically correct, but jumping on and off a horse to let it trigger an attack should not be allowed to fly in any sensible game. | |
| yesterday | history | answered | nonymous | CC BY-SA 4.0 |