If the aligned offset isn't sufficient for the field offset,
we were padding based on the aligned offset. We need to pad
based on the original offset instead.

Also set the Go alignment correctly for int128. We were defaulting
to the maximum alignment, but since we translate int128 into an
array of uint8 the correct Go alignment is 1.

For #69086
Fixes #69219

Change-Id: I23ce583335c81beac2ac51f7f9336ac97ccebf09
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/608815
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit c209892)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/611296
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>

…rray safely

In rare situations, like during same-sized grows, the source map for
maps.Clone may be overloaded (has more than 6.5 entries per
bucket). This causes the runtime to allocate a larger bucket array for
the destination map than for the source map. The maps.Clone code
walks off the end of the source array if it is smaller than the
destination array.

This is a pretty simple fix, ensuring that the destination bucket
array is never longer than the source bucket array. Maybe a better fix
is to make the Clone code handle shorter source arrays correctly, but
this fix is deliberately simple to reduce the risk of backporting this
fix.

Fixes #69156

Change-Id: I824c93d1db690999f25a3c43b2816fc28ace7509
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/610377
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>

…g conversion

There's a bug in the weak-to-strong conversion in that creating the
*only* strong pointer to some weakly-held object during the mark phase
may result in that object not being properly marked.

The exact mechanism for this is that the new strong pointer will always
point to a white object (because it was only weakly referenced up until
this point) and it can then be stored in a blackened stack, hiding it
from the garbage collector.

This "hide a white pointer in the stack" problem is pretty much exactly
what the Yuasa part of the hybrid write barrier is trying to catch, so
we need to do the same thing the write barrier would do: shade the
pointer.

Added a test and confirmed that it fails with high probability if the
pointer shading is missing.

For #69210.
Fixes #69240.

Change-Id: Iaae64ae95ea7e975c2f2c3d4d1960e74e1bd1c3f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/610396
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 79fd633)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/610696
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>

For #68984.
Fixes #69119.

Change-Id: I16d25777cb38a337cd4204a8147eaf866c3df9e1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/607695
Reviewed-by: Kirill Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Commit-Queue: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit 239666c)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/611415
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Bypass: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>

Currently the unique package tries to clone strings that get stored in
its internal map to avoid retaining large strings.

However, this falls over entirely due to the fact that the original
string is *still* stored in the map as a key. Whoops. Fix this by
storing the cloned value in the map instead.

This change also adds a test which fails without this change.

For #69370.
Fixes #69383.

Change-Id: I1a6bb68ed79b869ea12ab6be061a5ae4b4377ddb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/610738
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
(cherry picked from commit 21ac23a)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/612295
Auto-Submit: Tim King <taking@google.com>

For #69284
Fixes #69402

Change-Id: I6350209302778ba5e44fa03d0b9e680d2b4ec192
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/611495
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: roger peppe <rogpeppe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim King <taking@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8926ca9)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/613616
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>

…ngefunc

CL 584596 "-range<N>" suffix to the name of closure generated for a
rangefunc loop body. However, this breaks the condition that escape
analysis uses for checking whether a closure contains within function,
which is "F.funcN" for outer function "F" and closure "funcN".

Fixing this by adding new "-rangeN" to the condition.

Updates #69434
Fixes #69511

Change-Id: I411de8f63b69a6514a9e9504d49d62e00ce4115d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/614096
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/614195

…er, return correct result

The timer code is careful to ensure that if stop/reset is called
while a timer is being run, we cancel the run. However, the code
failed to ensure that in that case stop/reset returned true,
meaning that the timer had been stopped. In the racing case
stop/reset could see that t.when had been set to zero,
and return false, even though the timer had not and never would fire.

Fix this by tracking whether a timer run is in progress,
and using that to reliably detect that the run was cancelled,
meaning that stop/reset should return true.

For #69312
Fixes #69333

Change-Id: I78e870063eb96650638f12c056e32c931417c84a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/611496
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2ebaff4)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/616096
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>

Change-Id: I904d2e951796dd4142d6e9de4a55af07852bca51
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/617019
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>