Sitemap

Member-only story

Java Best Practices: Use Specific Exceptions Instead of Catching Generic Ones

Learn why catching generic exceptions like Exception or Throwable in Java is a bad practice. Discover how using specific exceptions improves error handling, debugging, and maintainability with complete examples.

4 min readFeb 28, 2025

--

πŸ“’ Stay Connected & Keep Learning! πŸš€

If you find my content valuable, please support with a clap πŸ‘ and share it with others! πŸš€

πŸ”— Explore my Udemy courses: Java Guides Udemy Courses
πŸ“– Read more tutorials on my blog: Java Guides
πŸŽ₯ Watch free Java video tutorials on YouTube: Java Guides YouTube

Now, let’s dive into the topic! πŸ‘‡

πŸš€ Why Avoid Catching Generic Exceptions?

In Java, exception handling is essential for writing robust and maintainable applications. However, catching generic exceptions like Exception or Throwable is a bad practice because it:

❌ Hides real errors β€” Makes debugging harder
❌ Catches unintended exceptions β€” Swallows critical runtime errors
❌ Makes code harder to maintain β€” Developers can’t quickly identify specific failures

πŸ’‘ Solution? Always catch specific exceptions instead of using a generic catch (Exception e).

πŸ“Œ In this article, you’ll learn:
βœ… Why catching generic exceptions is dangerous
βœ… How using specific exceptions improves debugging
βœ… Complete examples demonstrating best practices

πŸ” The Problem: Catching Generic Exceptions

βœ” Example: Catching Exception (Bad Practice)

public class GenericExceptionExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
int result = divide(10, 0);
System.out.println("Result: " + result);
} catch (Exception e) { // ❌ BAD: Catches all exceptions
System.out.println("An error occurred: " + e.getMessage());
}
}

public static int divide(int a, int b) {
return a / b; // Causes ArithmeticException
}
}

--

--

No responses yet