Member-only story
Java Best Practices: Log Exceptions Instead of Printing Stack Trace
Printing stack traces in Java makes debugging difficult and clutters logs. Learn why logging exceptions using Logger
is a best practice, and see real-world examples of structured error handling.
π’ Stay Connected & Keep Learning! π
If you find my content valuable, please support with a clap π and share it with others! π
π Explore my Udemy courses: Java Guides Udemy Courses
π Read more tutorials on my blog: Java Guides
π₯ Watch free Java video tutorials on YouTube: Java Guides YouTubeπ Read this article for free on my blog: Java Guides
Now, letβs dive into the topic! π
π Why You Should Log Exceptions Instead of Printing Stack Trace
When an exception occurs, many developers use e.printStackTrace()
for debugging. However, this approach is not recommended because:
β It clutters console output β Difficult to track in production logs
β Not structured or searchable β Hard to analyze in large applications
β Cannot be stored or sent to monitoring tools
π‘ Solution? Use a proper logging framework (java.util.logging
, SLF4J
, Log4j
) instead of printStackTrace()
.
π In this article, youβll learn:
β
Why printStackTrace()
is bad for production code
β
How to log exceptions properly using Logger
β
Complete examples with best practices
π The Problem: Using printStackTrace()
(Bad Practice)
β Example: Using printStackTrace()
(Incorrect Way)
public class StackTraceExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
int result = divide(10, 0);
} catch (ArithmeticException e) {
e.printStackTrace(); // β BAD: Prints raw stack trace
}
}
public static int divide(int a, int b) {
return a / b; // Causes ArithmeticException
}
}