Sitemap

Member-only story

Java Best Practices: Log Exceptions Instead of Printing Stack Trace

Printing stack traces in Java makes debugging difficult and clutters logs. Learn why logging exceptions using Logger is a best practice, and see real-world examples of structured error handling.

4 min readFeb 28, 2025

--

πŸ“’ Stay Connected & Keep Learning! πŸš€

If you find my content valuable, please support with a clap πŸ‘ and share it with others! πŸš€

πŸ”— Explore my Udemy courses: Java Guides Udemy Courses
πŸ“– Read more tutorials on my blog: Java Guides
πŸŽ₯ Watch free Java video tutorials on YouTube: Java Guides YouTube

πŸ“œ Read this article for free on my blog: Java Guides

Now, let’s dive into the topic! πŸ‘‡

πŸš€ Why You Should Log Exceptions Instead of Printing Stack Trace

When an exception occurs, many developers use e.printStackTrace() for debugging. However, this approach is not recommended because:

❌ It clutters console output β€” Difficult to track in production logs
❌ Not structured or searchable β€” Hard to analyze in large applications
❌ Cannot be stored or sent to monitoring tools

πŸ’‘ Solution? Use a proper logging framework (java.util.logging, SLF4J, Log4j) instead of printStackTrace().

πŸ“Œ In this article, you’ll learn:
βœ… Why printStackTrace() is bad for production code
βœ… How to log exceptions properly using Logger
βœ… Complete examples with best practices

πŸ” The Problem: Using printStackTrace() (Bad Practice)

βœ” Example: Using printStackTrace() (Incorrect Way)

public class StackTraceExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
int result = divide(10, 0);
} catch (ArithmeticException e) {
e.printStackTrace(); // ❌ BAD: Prints raw stack trace
}
}

public static int divide(int a, int b) {
return a / b; // Causes ArithmeticException
}
}

--

--

Responses (1)