The Rebirth of CAD: How Is Modern AI Different from the CAD We Know?

Affiliations

¹ Department of Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, Australia 5000; School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Australian Institute for Machine Learning, Adelaide, Australia.

Editorial

Luke Oakden-Rayner. Radiol Artif Intell. 2019.

. 2019 May 29;1(3):e180089.

doi: 10.1148/ryai.2019180089. eCollection 2019 May.

¹ Department of Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, Australia 5000; School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Australian Institute for Machine Learning, Adelaide, Australia.

No abstract available

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: L.O. disclosed no relevant relationships.

1. Rao VM, Levin DC, Parker L, Cavanaugh B, Frangos AJ, Sunshine JH. How widely is computer-aided detection used in screening and diagnostic mammography? J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7(10):802–805. - PubMed
1. Lehman CD, Wellman RD, Buist DS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital screening mammography with and without computer-aided detection. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175(11):1828–1837. - PMC - PubMed
1. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007;356(14):1399–1409. - PMC - PubMed
1. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2008;359(16):1675–1684. - PubMed
1. Tchou PM, Haygood TM, Atkinson EN, et al. Interpretation time of computer-aided detection at screening mammography. Radiology 2010;257(1):40–46. - PubMed