Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • $\begingroup$ That melting point trend seems pretty close to linear, aside for Oganesson. Is that coincidence, or is there something about Oganesson which makes it buck a trend? (e.g. like relativistic effects changing Au/Hg properties.) $\endgroup$ Commented 11 hours ago
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As an article states, relativistic effects shifts melting temperature up by about $100K$, but we should not forget that for $\text{Og}$ this is just an estimation (modelling) of a melting property, while for the other noble gases- these melting points are more or less confirmed experimentally (measured). So we can't actually align linear trend to Oganesson simply due to the fact that we be comparing apples to the oranges. $\endgroup$ Commented 8 hours ago
  • $\begingroup$ This made me wonder whether anyone has ever produced a sample of liquid radon. Apparently just once, in 1909. $\endgroup$ Commented 1 hour ago