Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
51 mins ago answer added Qmechanic timeline score: 1
7 hours ago history became hot network question
8 hours ago comment added peek-a-boo Re last paragraph: But we do use compactness several times when discussing minimizers of functionals (particularly in the Sobolev space context). Namely we use Banach-Alaoglu and also the Rellich compactness theorems. See Evans’ PDE book chapter 8 for explicit assumptions on the class of functionals considered.
10 hours ago comment added Cleonis I copy a paragraph from my existing answer: The Brachistochrone problem straddles two categories of application of calculus of variations. It's a Statics problem in the sense that the solution is a static shape: which shape has the property that sliding along it happens in the fastest time? But to get at the solution Dynamics must be applied: given a curve, how fast will an object slide down the curve? It's not a Statics problem: something is moving. It's not a Dynamics problem: for any value of the gravitaitonal acceleration the solution has the same shape.
11 hours ago comment added Buzz Compactness seems like something far stronger than necessary. A completeness property on the metric space of paths (say, continuous and of bounded variation) ought to be enough.
13 hours ago answer added Cleonis timeline score: 3
15 hours ago answer added controlgroup timeline score: 6
15 hours ago comment added controlgroup "Given the terrible failure of compactness in all reasonable function spaces why do so many natural/interesting calculus of variations problems turn out to be solvable?" -- you might consider that we, as mere mortal humans, might happen to be interested in problems that are reasonably simple and thus are more likely to have solutions.
S 15 hours ago review First questions
14 hours ago
S 15 hours ago history asked Noah Schweber CC BY-SA 4.0