Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "and as far as I know no one has actually proposed a local hidden variable theory in which this happens." Gerardus 't Hooft, physics nobel prize winner, as been working on this arxiv.org/abs/2103.04335 $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 10, 2022 at 18:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MiltonSilva I think all he does in that and similar papers is argue that the outcomes of all future measurements can be encoded into the initial conditions, which has the same problem as arguing that God created fake fossils 6000 years ago: there's no reason for fake fossils to seem to support biological evolution unless God deliberately chose to deceive us. 't Hooft doesn't know how to make a superdeterministic theory that naturally behaves like QM. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 13, 2022 at 18:21