Timeline for answer to What are some counterarguments to Schopenhauer's refutation of free will? by Kelley Harvey
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2023 at 9:44 | comment | added | Nikos M. | Being a vegeteraian myself, I sympathize with the answer, which I do think provides a tangible counter-example to Schopenhauer's a priori argument. | |
| Dec 30, 2015 at 21:46 | comment | added | Joseph Weissman | Subjective answers are definitely okay, but it can help to be really clear about how your interpretation is grounded in the text that the questioner is studying | |
| Dec 30, 2015 at 21:42 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Dec 31, 2015 at 0:13 | |||||
| Dec 30, 2015 at 21:15 | comment | added | Kelley Harvey | @PhilipKlöcking I appreciate your observation, such that it is. My comments were not offered collectively as reference, but rather personal experience. As this site also mentions personal experience in the guidelines for submitting responses, I do not believe my post was in fact contrary to the purposes or desires of the site, as indicated. Please review the text displayed for those posting as guests. | |
| Dec 30, 2015 at 21:04 | review | Late answers | |||
| Jan 2, 2016 at 9:33 | |||||
| Dec 30, 2015 at 20:59 | comment | added | Philip Klöcking♦ | Welcome to Philosophy.SE. Your second sentence contradicts the purpose and desired contents of this site, as we are looking for answers based on references and sources. Please see the help center for more information. Kant did adress the contradiction (or lack thereof) within the conceptions of freedom in his third antinomy of pure reason in the Critique of Pure Reason from 1781, by the way. | |
| Dec 30, 2015 at 20:47 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 31, 2015 at 6:55 | |||||
| Dec 30, 2015 at 20:45 | history | answered | Kelley Harvey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |