You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.
We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.
-
"... if you really pay attention to that process, you truly have no idea who is coming up with these questions and who's weighing them and who makes the final decision. It just… happens." Introspection often creates biases. In this particular case, when you are trying to pay attention to your own decision making process, the part of you who is paying attention is not the part of you who is deciding. So the observing part of you will lack a sense of deciding (will not feel like it is deciding), since it is not in fact deciding but observing the part of you that is deciding.Olivier5– Olivier52023-09-08 10:25:12 +00:00Commented Sep 8, 2023 at 10:25
-
That is an interesting perspective. But then, the part of me that is consciously focusing its attention, the "me" that is observing, my conscience experience, apparently isn't the one making the decision. The decision is made by some part of "me" which "I" am not focussing on at the moment. So… it's not my "free will" making any decision, the decision is being made without my doing by some part of "me".deceze– deceze2023-09-08 10:48:21 +00:00Commented Sep 8, 2023 at 10:48
-
It's the "free will" of that part of you making decision A. That part of you paying attention has made its own decision, decision B, which is to pay attention to how decision A is made. But it has not paid attention to its own decision B.Olivier5– Olivier52023-09-08 11:01:22 +00:00Commented Sep 8, 2023 at 11:01
-
Then it seems to come down to a discrepancy of the term "free will". I would think that only the conscious part of "me" could make "free willed decisions", if anything. If some part of "me" can make decisions without me being consciously aware of it or consciously doing it, then it is an automated process in some sense or another which I'm free to consciously focus on or not. That's "inside the box" free-will to me.deceze– deceze2023-09-08 11:08:20 +00:00Commented Sep 8, 2023 at 11:08
-
Personally, I don't like the term "free will", find it ambiguous (other than in legal language where it clearly means "by one's own desire or decision, unforced by others"). In philosophy, I prefer the term "free choice" or even better, "agency". But that's semantics.Olivier5– Olivier52023-09-08 11:49:25 +00:00Commented Sep 8, 2023 at 11:49
|
Show 7 more comments
How to Edit
- Correct minor typos or mistakes
- Clarify meaning without changing it
- Add related resources or links
- Always respect the author’s intent
- Don’t use edits to reply to the author
How to Format
-
create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
``` -
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
``` - put returns between paragraphs
- for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
- _italic_ or **bold**
- quote by placing > at start of line
- to make links (use https whenever possible)
<https://example.com>[example](https://example.com)<a href="https://example.com">example</a>
How to Tag
A tag is a keyword or label that categorizes your question with other, similar questions. Choose one or more (up to 5) tags that will help answerers to find and interpret your question.
- complete the sentence: my question is about...
- use tags that describe things or concepts that are essential, not incidental to your question
- favor using existing popular tags
- read the descriptions that appear below the tag
If your question is primarily about a topic for which you can't find a tag:
- combine multiple words into single-words with hyphens (e.g. philosophy-of-science), up to a maximum of 35 characters
- creating new tags is a privilege; if you can't yet create a tag you need, then post this question without it, then ask the community to create it for you