Timeline for answer to What objective criteria do philosophers apply to assess Philosophy.SE questions? by Philomath
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2025 at 20:01 | history | migrated | from philosophy.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Jan 31, 2025 at 19:55 | vote | accept | Michael Hall | ||
| Jan 31, 2025 at 15:46 | comment | added | Michael Hall | @Rushi, "Why and how do you interact with this site?" That element certainly exists, but I've expanded the idea to include ...to parse legitimate philosophical questions from the ordinary? | |
| Jan 31, 2025 at 15:38 | comment | added | Michael Hall | I disagree with Rushi, and love this answer. Concise and to the point, which is rare here. Yes, as much as I tried to stress "objective criteria" I understand and agree any answer will require a certain amount of subjectivity. It's really that second bullet that seems to be lacking in many of the questions that prompted me to ask this. I won't accept this answer yet, but this is precisely the sort of justification for considering a question worthy of an answer that I was looking for. | |
| Jan 31, 2025 at 5:32 | comment | added | Philomath | @Rushi Seems to me like I gave four criteria that I apply to questions in order to assess these questions. This was exactly the question. The preamble was to point out that the demand for objective critteria would be difficult to meet with. | |
| Jan 31, 2025 at 5:23 | comment | added | Rushi | This looks like an answer to a different question, viz. Why and how do you interact with this site? Or something along those lines. | |
| Jan 31, 2025 at 4:22 | history | answered | Philomath | CC BY-SA 4.0 |