Skip to main content
Open Source

Return to Question

Became Hot Network Question
fixed grammar
Source Link
edit approved yesterday
Anushka_Grace
edit approved yesterday
Anushka_Grace
  • 367
  • 1
  • 12

I have a project licensed under the EUPLv1.2 license, and I want to incorporate GPLv3-licensed code in it. However, due to the GPL's copyleft, that is not legally possible.

Is it possible to dual-license the project with both licenses (EUPLv1.2 and GPLv3) to allow for the GPLv3-licensed code to be incorporated in it, even if the code is not compatibledespite incompatibility with one of the licenses (EUPLv1EUPLv1.2)?

I have a project licensed under the EUPLv1.2 license, and I want to incorporate GPLv3-licensed code in it. However, due to the GPL's copyleft, that is not legally possible.

Is it possible to dual-license the project with both licenses (EUPLv1.2 and GPLv3) to allow for the GPLv3-licensed code to be incorporated in it, even if the code is not compatible with one of the licenses (EUPLv1.2)?

I have a project licensed under the EUPLv1.2 license, and I want to incorporate GPLv3-licensed code in it. However, due to the GPL's copyleft, that is not legally possible.

Is it possible to dual-license the project with both licenses (EUPLv1.2 and GPLv3) to allow for the GPLv3-licensed code to be incorporated in it, despite incompatibility with EUPLv1.2?

Source Link
horsey_guy
horsey_guy
  • 133
  • 6

Can a dual-licensed project include code only compatible with one of the licenses?

I have a project licensed under the EUPLv1.2 license, and I want to incorporate GPLv3-licensed code in it. However, due to the GPL's copyleft, that is not legally possible.

Is it possible to dual-license the project with both licenses (EUPLv1.2 and GPLv3) to allow for the GPLv3-licensed code to be incorporated in it, even if the code is not compatible with one of the licenses (EUPLv1.2)?