Timeline for Why do we need a 3-way handshake? Why not just 2-way?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
25 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2021 at 1:32 | comment | added | generalnetworkerror | Better question is to ask why not 4-way handshake? | |
| Feb 9, 2020 at 6:54 | answer | added | Banghua Zhao | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 26, 2019 at 10:20 | answer | added | Shuai Li | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 26, 2018 at 19:10 | history | edited | Ron Maupin♦ |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
| Oct 3, 2018 at 22:05 | comment | added | Mike76 | Although the 3-way-handshake might be a waste, I think that it does not matter if the client starts to send data. Think of a simple HTTP request: The client can start to send payload immediately after the ack package without waiting for yet another server response. The bloated HTTP headers might be a much larger waste. | |
| May 15, 2018 at 14:43 | history | protected | Ron Maupin♦ | ||
| May 15, 2018 at 9:33 | answer | added | Sanzhar Yeleuov | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 5, 2018 at 23:16 | comment | added | kmiklas | QUIC en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/QUIC | |
| May 23, 2016 at 1:58 | answer | added | Tuntable | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 6, 2015 at 23:25 | comment | added | Alnitak | Don't forget about TCP Fast Open (RFC 7413) | |
| Nov 5, 2015 at 14:44 | answer | added | The Spooniest | timeline score: 27 | |
| Nov 5, 2015 at 8:20 | vote | accept | smwikipedia | ||
| Nov 5, 2015 at 8:15 | answer | added | Sergio | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 5, 2015 at 5:15 | vote | accept | smwikipedia | ||
| Nov 5, 2015 at 8:20 | |||||
| Nov 5, 2015 at 1:02 | answer | added | Lexelby | timeline score: 9 | |
| Nov 5, 2015 at 0:03 | comment | added | user541686 | @YLearn: Sorry, it's not really a question of my own, but rather it was to motivate readers to give answers that dig a little deeper than what is literally stated in the question. | |
| Nov 4, 2015 at 23:12 | comment | added | YLearn | @Mehrdad, if you have a question of your own, please use the Ask Question link at the top of the page to post your own. | |
| S Nov 4, 2015 at 22:31 | history | suggested | psmears | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improve wording and grammar
|
| Nov 4, 2015 at 22:26 | comment | added | OzNetNerd | If you want to skip the handshake you could use UDP instead. | |
| Nov 4, 2015 at 20:50 | comment | added | user541686 | Why do we even need a handshake? Why can't the message be sent with the first packet? | |
| Nov 4, 2015 at 20:09 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 4, 2015 at 22:31 | |||||
| Nov 4, 2015 at 18:41 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackNetworkEng/status/661976534371184643 | ||
| Nov 4, 2015 at 16:56 | answer | added | Eddie | timeline score: 245 | |
| Nov 4, 2015 at 15:05 | answer | added | dr_ | timeline score: 28 | |
| Nov 4, 2015 at 14:36 | history | asked | smwikipedia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |