Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • It's definitely legible in my opinion. I don't think it makes sense to put any stock in the capabilities of any notation software. New orthography is created all the time and even the most flexible software can't keep up. Commented 19 hours ago
  • A fascinating question! I agree with @ToddWilcox that it's legible, but as it's uncommon to find such notation you will probably have to clarify your meaning. From a percussion perspective I wouldn't be surprised if this becomes fairly common in a short period of time (as it has been suggested many times before). However, from a keyboard perspective the triplet-indicating "3" may be accidentally interpreted as a fingering. Commented 19 hours ago
  • @Hamelin tuplet figures are typically easily to distinguish from fingerings by virtue of their different typeface and larger size. Also, if the score provides fingerings elsewhere then it should provide them for the abbreviated passage, further reducing the likelihood of confusion. Commented 1 hour ago
  • @ToddWilcox It is not at all new orthography. I know engravings that are well older than a century that use this exact notation. Commented 1 hour ago
  • @Hamelin It has not only been suggested before, it has been used in professional editing for a long time now. Commented 1 hour ago