Timeline for answer to Community Engagement Across the Network: Focus for 2026 by Journeyman Geek
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26 at 16:43 | comment | added | M-- | People, familiar faces, individuals, etc. But we're not writing a novel here; if it conveys the meaning and is grammatically sound, the rest becomes a matter of taste. | |
| Jan 26 at 14:29 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek | Well - In this case, especially considering some of the points I talk about over time, and certain recent events, intentionally avoiding the term staff was intentional. I didn't want to use staff because in this case an essential point I was trying to make was to avoid silos, both in terms of staff and non staff, and traditionally/formally community facing roles vs more back end roles. | |
| Jan 26 at 14:08 | comment | added | M-- | Surely there are other words besides "folks" conveying the message so that you don't need to use it 4 times ;) but as an edit it was somewhat of an overstepping, apologies. | |
| Jan 26 at 4:23 | history | edited | Journeyman Geek | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
informality here is intended
|
| Jan 26 at 2:59 | history | edited | M-- | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Jan 25 at 2:33 | history | edited | Journeyman Geek | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 149 characters in body
|
| Jan 25 at 0:08 | history | answered | Journeyman Geek | CC BY-SA 4.0 |