Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

13
  • 14
    "Reality: In under 3 hours—3 downvotes, 3 close votes, 1 delete vote. Zero explanatory comments." so, in other words Claude completely lied to you. But it sounds like you blame the site for not conforming to the BS Claude said. Rather than condemning Claude for saying BS. Commented Jan 14 at 15:36
  • 7
    So what you're saying is, claud was quite innacurate Commented Jan 14 at 15:37
  • 10
    I'm surprised you took Claude at its word, given how wide and unfocused the question is. You should have the experience to know the question you posted isn't a good fit for SO. To paraphrase it, it's "I am doing something with VoIP and I need to ensure the audio quality. How can CI/CD help? And what unit tests should I add?" Which is really all over the place topic-wise. Commented Jan 14 at 15:38
  • 3
    The question you asked is marketedly off topic as a Q&A question. you may have had better luck asking it as a discussion, since a discussion is likely the kind of answer you're looking for Commented Jan 14 at 15:39
  • 2
    "After a great discussion". That means your initial prompt is not clear enough to provide an answer even considered good enough to you. Did you incorporate the subsequent clarification info in all following prompts to your SO question? Commented Jan 14 at 23:47
  • 1
    @VLAZ Everybody here is attacking instantly, but the reality is SO is a place where if you go to ask a question about a real problem you're facing you're more likely to face moderation than answering. People here know how to ask a good question that won't get closed, sure. But the default new-user experience is "if I go to an LLM, I get an answer. If I go to SO, I'm going to probably get closed, but I might get a better answer." Commented Jan 15 at 0:42
  • 2
    SO needs to be more willing to just help people. It's constantly shutting out new questions and enforcing quality standards that need to change. People were fine with just dealing with those standards before, but now that LLMs are an option, people are like: "I don't have to deal with this. I don't have to ask a super awesome, well-researched, laser-focused paper of a question. I have another option. That option is AI, and it doesn't harass me, downvote me, mark my question as a duplicate of outdated crap, or delete my question. It'll answer the best I can, and I have unlimited access to it." Commented Jan 15 at 0:43
  • To whom give the edit suggest to remove the picture, no I want to keep it, otherwise the comment does not make sense then "It is not toxicity when someone acts offensively (using AI on SO) and refuses to learn when presented with more information about their actions." That is a good one! Commented Jan 15 at 5:51
  • 1
    @Rumi-SEMustFollowtheCC-SA I mean, did you read the AI response, and did you compare it with the reality? Because the AI response misrepresented reality. It seems "helpful" only until you follow it. I don't know what else I need to say here. Evidence suggests the AI response wasn't helpful and yet you're the second person trying to argue that the world has to conform change to conform to the AI response, rather than the other way around. Commented Jan 15 at 6:01
  • If you want the (irrelevant) LLM content (that I edited out pending approval), in review either reject it or accept it (to document it) & roll it back or accept it with changes to keep only my other changes. But it adds nothing. Comments are ephemeral & there's no particular reason to keep comments about old versions or have them make sense; they have merely become No Longer Needed. Anyway if you considered them still useful you could just comment about what used to be there. Post history is reached via the 'edited' button. PS The name of a suggesting editor is on the review page. Commented Jan 15 at 6:47
  • Re LLM output images: Why are images of text, code and mathematical expressions discouraged? More: Why should I not upload images of code/data/errors? Commented Jan 15 at 6:49
  • You need to use @ if you want someone to be notified if there is more than one commenter. Commented Jan 15 at 8:59
  • 2
    It is never appropriate to be rude, whether directly or sarcastically, just do not do it, even to respond to it. meta.stackexchange.com/help/conduct Commented Jan 15 at 9:01