Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • The peculiar thing is that everyone could already notice the decline trend before Prosus bought it. The big question is how anyone could ever think that anything but (targeted) advertising would work as a business model for this site - all byproducts like company sponsorships or the "Teams" thing aren't going to bring in money in the long term. Commented Jan 12 at 10:44
  • 4
    There's been speculation (far-fetched or not?) that the purchase wasn't even meant to bring in profit since nobody sane would buy SO in hope to make profit. But that was just part of the general "white washing" that Prosus is doing on behalf of their apartheid-associated parent company Naspers. More info: physics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/13609/… Commented Jan 12 at 10:45
  • 1
    It's worth remembering that Teams was relatively newly-launched when the purchase happened and it was seen as a pretty major revenue stream. Microsoft Teams didn't add Q&A until 2022, so I think it was seen as a really viable product offering... now that it's part of MSFT Teams, though, I imagine it's struggling to compete. Commented Jan 14 at 15:06
  • Prosus basically bet a fair bit on the ed-tech market right around covid. If nothing else, we are probably in better shape than one of their other investments, a formerly massive indian ed-tech org called bijous IIRC Commented Jan 15 at 10:29