Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 3
    The way to opt-out of granting the license to use your input is to not use the tool. If you use their tool, you agree to the terms. Similarly, there is no way to contribute content to the Q&A sites without licensing it to the company. This is pretty much boilerplate for online services these days. Not saying that’s good; it’s just how it is. Commented Dec 6, 2025 at 22:54
  • "Who really owns it?" Legally you. But you let them use the data. So they are on the same level as you in some regards. Something they could not do is giving others the same conditions. You could. Because you are the owner. And ColleenV is right. The only way out is not using the service. Commented Dec 7, 2025 at 10:04
  • @NoDataDumpNoContribution only they can grant others, because of the sublicense clause. The only things they can't do are transfer the ownership to someone self, or sue someone for noncompliance with the license, unless it's a direct license from them. (If they license to someone and then that person licenses it to someone who is noncompliance, they can't sue) Commented Dec 7, 2025 at 13:08
  • Well I certainly won't, but the main points are, they should provide options to completely hide the chat from the top of the screen, or at least collapse it and get it out of the way. And they know full well under 1% of people will read and understand those terms and put things in they wouldn't want added to a training database and shared and sublicensed. I'm sure sooner than later they'll hear some requests and grant the ability to completely hide it, which should have been an option at release. Commented Dec 8, 2025 at 17:44