Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

6
  • 1
    For what it’s worth, I deleted my accounts here in 2019, all of my chat content from that time appears to be present. I even have starred content still there. Commented Oct 21, 2025 at 19:04
  • 2
    @Snow I think what they're referring to is that said content is dissociated from the parent user and labelled only as "Anonymous", without any identifier stored - not even the user123456 that deleted users on a regular SE site would have - so there is no way to link previous abusive behaviour to a recreated chat user. Commented Oct 21, 2025 at 21:53
  • 1
    But self deletion shouldn’t result in disassociation? I went through self deletion of my accounts and my chat content remains. As far as I know, only SE staff can disassociate profiles and anonymise. I stand to be corrected however. Commented Oct 21, 2025 at 22:03
  • 4
    By the history, yes I do mean that all their past actions are no longer linked to their profile. For example, a user with several flagged messages, and currently serving a suspension, could delete their Stack Overflow account, recreate it and they would appear entirely new in chat; no flagged messages, no suspension, nothing. They rejoin with a completely clean sheet on chat. Commented Oct 22, 2025 at 7:50
  • @Snow That's likely because you posted 1,000+ messages in the past - users who post 1,000+ messages won't have their chat.SO or chat.MSE profile deleted if they remove their account on the corresponding sites. Commented Nov 27, 2025 at 17:40
  • @SonictheAnonymousHedgehog - seeing a lot of my old content still there makes me wish I could get it back and merged into my current account, but I know that’s outside the remit of what’s reasonably possible so I’m not about to push it. Commented Nov 27, 2025 at 20:12