Timeline for answer to Fix the misleading parts of the new policy on AI-authored content and feature it by kaya3
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2023 at 14:17 | history | bounty awarded | gnat | ||
| Jun 6, 2023 at 14:44 | comment | added | Machavity | No. There are some ongoing negotiations so I am hopeful we get answers soon. | |
| Jun 6, 2023 at 14:42 | comment | added | kaya3 | @Machavity Interesting, so Stack Exchange, Inc. don't seem to have identified any harm that would be caused by making the policy public? | |
| Jun 6, 2023 at 12:37 | comment | added | Machavity | FWIW, I posted a dissection of the difference in the Mod Team. The original post there went into a lot of detail not for public consumption. We've done our best to keep that part private for the sake of good-faith negotiations, but SE has still not seen fit to respond to that difference, just post more data on what lead them to make said decision. Sadly, the new data hasn't improved our view on their stance all that much, nor explained why the full policy can't be public. | |
| Jun 5, 2023 at 1:21 | comment | added | Robotnik | Machavity (SO mod) has shared some of the details in this summary: meta.stackoverflow.com/q/424979/951830, anything more than what is said here would probably at least risk a mod's diamond. | |
| Jun 5, 2023 at 0:42 | history | edited | kaya3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 326 characters in body
|
| Jun 5, 2023 at 0:26 | history | answered | kaya3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |