Timeline for Is the voting and reputation system sustainable? How can we improve it or maybe it should be replaced?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2019 at 16:42 | history | edited | This_is_NOT_a_forum | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Active reading. [(its = possessive, it's = "it is" or "it has". See for example <http://www.wikihow.com/Use-Its-and-It%27s>.)]
|
| Nov 20, 2019 at 14:14 | comment | added | Sextus Empiricus | @gbjbaanb Here is a sql query that tracks the development of the different answers. In this case the increase is roughly growing as the square of time 'score ~ constant*time^2' and the score of the different answers will start to grow further apart (and new answers will have little chance). I am sure that there will be other interesting questions with strange growth in growth for the different answers. | |
| Nov 20, 2019 at 7:14 | comment | added | Resistance Is Futile | It is like democracy. Mostly it sucks, but we don't have better system. Problem is not in voting and reputation system on their own, it is more that we don't have any additional tools to ensure really bad answers are either removed or marked as bad (beyond the comment) and similar. Also this is why it is of utmost importance that old, knowledgeable users stay and contribute if nothing more then to help cleaning up such things or commenting at least. But everything SE has done lately is going in completely opposite direction. | |
| Nov 20, 2019 at 0:04 | history | answered | gbjbaanb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |