Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • 31
    This decision is yours alone to make, of course, but I'm having a really hard time seeing anything substantial they've done to address the core concerns since this thing erupted. Commented Oct 12, 2019 at 18:45
  • 2
    @Pëkka I don't disagree that some things aren't good, but my main concerns have been addressed. All of the milestones in David Fullerton's post were met, SE has made a significantly improved effort to get feedback from moderators on changes as well as incorporating that feedback into future revisions, and is actively answering questions that we have. I hope to see continued engagement with not only mods, but the broader community over the next few months and into 2020. Commented Oct 12, 2019 at 19:50
  • 2
    May I ask, what is the "stuff that I've seen on site has given me hope that SE is at least going to try more"? Can you link to it (or some examples) please? It's very hard to follow what (if anything) they've actually done in response to any of this. Commented Oct 13, 2019 at 14:10
  • 1
    @user568458 Most of it is moderator-only, so I can't get into details of what has been shared. The important thing is that every milestone in David Fullerton's post was hit and SE has started to reach out and collaborate with moderators on a couple of things. I'm hopeful that this collaboration will continue to strengthen and that there's an improved relationship with the broader community. Commented Oct 13, 2019 at 14:13