Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 12, 2020 at 10:24 comment added David Roberts @JoeT I think the best thing to come out of this might be the extra exposure Mochizuki's pre-IUT work has gotten. If we are to take M's account on faith, a lot of his work 2000-2010 was leading up to the IUT papers. None of these are disputed. From what I understand of Dupuy and Hilado's reading of Mochizuki, there are some interesting ideas about arithmetic geometry, especially if one takes their probabilistic version on board. As Scholze forcefully discussed on Woit's blog, the categorical stuff is less clear. But: I am not an expert in this area, just have paid close attention for ages!
Sep 12, 2020 at 8:37 comment added user164740 @DavidRoberts do you think it's now more clear what has been produced by Mochizuki?
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Aug 5, 2015 at 7:09 comment added M.G. @Timothy Chow: Thank you for your answer! I did read the/an article of Cipra, but apparently I read only the first one, with the very similar sounding title "Fermat' Theorem proved?". Because of the name, I did not realize there was actually a second article of Cipra on the same topic but discussing the aftermath (no pun intended). So, I guess, after all, the attack did have to do with the famous $c_1^2\leq 3c_2$ :)
Aug 5, 2015 at 7:00 vote accept M.G.
Aug 4, 2015 at 22:57 comment added David Roberts People should keep this sort of outcome in mind when approaching Mochizuki's abc work: it will produce something, even if not abc, and the scope and ambition of his decade-long (or longer!) project should yield something pretty serious from what I've seen.
Aug 4, 2015 at 20:19 history edited Timothy Chow CC BY-SA 3.0
Added another reference
Aug 4, 2015 at 20:06 history answered Timothy Chow CC BY-SA 3.0