Timeline for answer to Does debanking, based on politics or the like, run afoul of law? by Tiger Guy
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24 at 3:38 | comment | added | bdb484 | Is this in any way an answer to the question? Or just a bunch of predictions about the future? | |
| Jan 23 at 17:14 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | @gatorback: Fla. Stat. 655.0323. Referenced in paragraph 82 of the suit as linked in the answer. | |
| Jan 23 at 16:19 | comment | added | gatorback | What is the applicable Florida Statute? | |
| Jan 23 at 15:36 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | Note the point in littleadv's answer: this would be unlawful under Florida law today, but was not in 2021 (unless some other law applies). Also, the Florida law says it can be enforced only by banking regulators, not by private lawsuit. So while your point is valid in general (assuming the law is constitutional, which I don't think is obvious), it isn't applicable to the Trump case. It's unclear what valid reason they could have for citing this law in their filing, except perhaps to make the general point that "debanking" is a matter of public concern. | |
| Jan 23 at 8:17 | history | answered | Tiger Guy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |