Skip to main content
Law

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

8
  • Comments have been moved to chat; please do not continue the discussion here. Before posting a comment below this one, please review the purposes of comments. Comments that do not request clarification or suggest improvements usually belong as an answer, on Law Meta, or in Law Chat. Comments continuing discussion may be removed. Commented Aug 16, 2024 at 1:08
  • 1
    Just a minor correction, this event did not happen at a Disney park, it occurred at a public area called Disney Springs, completely open to the public with no entry fee, parking fee, etc. the area is similar to a strip mall and the stores aren't owned by Disney. Commented Aug 16, 2024 at 8:02
  • 5
    Another factual point is that Disney are claiming that the agreement accepted by this man binds not only him, but the estate of his late wife (who did not sign such an agreement herself). And another point is that the arbitration clause Disney are relying on is not contained in the agreement itself, but rather a separate document which is two hyperlinks away from the text of the agreement. Commented Aug 16, 2024 at 13:49
  • 3
    Worth noting that after the bad publicity it received, that Disney waived its right to arbitrate this case. Commented Aug 22, 2024 at 2:56
  • 1
    Link to story about Disney's waiver: boingboing.net/2024/08/21/… Commented Aug 22, 2024 at 3:01