Skip to main content
History

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • What's wrong with simply going by epoch for the types like Falls, Fs-u and Uacs? Commented Jul 26, 2021 at 16:09
  • @LangLangC 1) I don't know where exactly I should look and 2) I'd like to know what was actually used with this locomotive. For goods I think I can probably assume if it existed it probably was, for passengers not so much. Commented Jul 26, 2021 at 17:45
  • As sole engine it wasn't used for passengers, but as an adjunct for extra-power difficult/steep tracks. But that's also the main reason for intro of this type: be able to pull x tons at y% inclination — as load on the otherwise independently standardized cars/wagons attached to it and other engines. That's why I do not really understand the question: do you assume that this locomotive had specially designed cars to go with it/just for this? (If yes: please add that assumption explicitly to the Qtext.) Commented Jul 26, 2021 at 20:15
  • 1
    @LаngLаngС question updated. Commented Jul 27, 2021 at 8:49