Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

8
  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. Commented Nov 6, 2016 at 17:53
  • 1
    @Schwern - No, I was thinking of the I-351 class submarine. Commented Mar 28, 2017 at 18:49
  • 3
    Note also that the route taken was specifically chosen to take advantage of the fog at those latitudes at that time of year. The much more southerly route to Panama would not have given them that additional cover. Commented Nov 21, 2017 at 22:44
  • 1
    In re-reading, an additional point comes to mind. The U.S. had good information on when the fleet carriers arrived in and departed port in Japan. Disappearing completely for a period > 3 or 4 weeks really narrows the possible targets, because very little of strategic importance is that far from Japan. Commented Dec 22, 2017 at 15:31
  • 1
    @DJClayworth My numerous acknowlegments of your descriptive linguistic assistance. I will correct the offending passage forthwith. Commented Jan 3, 2024 at 19:33