Skip to content

Conversation

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #12254

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #12241

What is changed and how it works?

Since column values don't include virtual generated columns, we also filter the virtual generated columns in the column dispatcher.
The column dispatcher now explicitly checks for and prevents the use of virtual generated columns, returning an ErrDispatcherFailed error if such columns are specified. This prevents potential panics when configuring the dispatcher.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test

Questions

Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?

Release note

Fix panic when configuring the column dispatcher with virtual columns.
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-7.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-7.5 from a source PR. labels Sep 12, 2025
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 12, 2025

This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by triage owners.
Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To merge this cherry pick:

  1. It must be approved by the approvers firstly.
  2. AFTER it has been approved by approvers, please wait for the cherry-pick merging approval from triage owners.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

@wk989898 This PR has conflicts, I have hold it.
Please resolve them or ask others to resolve them, then comment /unhold to remove the hold label.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 12, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign lichunzhu for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 12, 2025

@ti-chi-bot: ## If you want to know how to resolve it, please read the guide in TiDB Dev Guide.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 12, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @ti-chi-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the robustness of the column dispatcher by introducing explicit validation for column types. It resolves an issue where configuring the dispatcher with virtual generated columns could lead to panics. The changes ensure that the system gracefully handles invalid column configurations by returning detailed errors, thereby improving stability and preventing unexpected failures.

Highlights

  • Enhanced Error Handling for Column Dispatcher: The OffsetsByNames function in TableInfo now returns an error instead of a boolean, providing more specific context for failures during column lookup.
  • Prevention of Virtual Column Usage: The column dispatcher explicitly checks for virtual generated columns and returns an ErrDispatcherFailed if they are specified, preventing potential panics.
  • Improved Error Messages: More descriptive error messages are now provided when columns are not found or virtual generated columns are detected during event dispatching.
  • Expanded Unit Tests: Unit tests have been updated and expanded to cover the new error handling for both non-existent and virtual generated columns, ensuring robustness.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly identifies and handles virtual columns in the column dispatcher to prevent a panic. The changes in cdc/model/schema_storage.go and its corresponding test are well-implemented. However, the pull request contains unresolved merge conflicts in cdc/sink/dmlsink/mq/dispatcher/partition/columns.go and cdc/sink/dmlsink/mq/dispatcher/partition/columns_test.go. These are critical issues that will prevent the code from compiling and must be resolved. Additionally, the test for virtual columns in columns_test.go is broken and needs to be fixed to ensure the changes are properly validated.

Comment on lines +57 to 71
<<<<<<< HEAD
offsets, ok := row.TableInfo.OffsetsByNames(r.Columns)
if !ok {
log.Error("columns not found when dispatch event",
zap.Any("tableName", row.Table),
zap.Strings("columns", r.Columns))
return 0, "", errors.ErrDispatcherFailed.GenWithStack(
"columns not found when dispatch event, table: %v, columns: %v", row.Table, r.Columns)
=======
offsets, err := row.TableInfo.OffsetsByNames(r.Columns)
if err != nil {
log.Error("dispatch event failed", zap.Error(err))
return 0, "", err
>>>>>>> 35ff0a22ec (sink(ticdc): check virtual columns in column dispatcher (#12254))
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

This file contains unresolved merge conflict markers. This will cause a compilation failure and must be resolved. The correct implementation appears to be the one that uses the error return from OffsetsByNames.

    offsets, err := row.TableInfo.OffsetsByNames(r.Columns)
	if err != nil {
		log.Error("dispatch event failed", zap.Error(err))
		return 0, "", err
	}
Comment on lines +28 to +41
<<<<<<< HEAD
=======
tidbTableInfo := &timodel.TableInfo{
ID: 100,
Name: pmodel.NewCIStr("t1"),
Columns: []*timodel.ColumnInfo{
{ID: 1, Name: pmodel.NewCIStr("col2"), Offset: 1, FieldType: *types.NewFieldType(mysql.TypeLong)},
{ID: 2, Name: pmodel.NewCIStr("col1"), Offset: 0, FieldType: *types.NewFieldType(mysql.TypeLong)},
{ID: 3, Name: pmodel.NewCIStr("col3"), Offset: 2, FieldType: *types.NewFieldType(mysql.TypeLong)},
{ID: 4, Name: pmodel.NewCIStr("col4"), Offset: 3, FieldType: *types.NewFieldType(mysql.TypeLong), GeneratedExprString: "generated"},
},
}
tableInfo := model.WrapTableInfo(100, "test", 33, tidbTableInfo)
>>>>>>> 35ff0a22ec (sink(ticdc): check virtual columns in column dispatcher (#12254))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

This file contains unresolved merge conflict markers which will cause a compilation failure. Please resolve them. The code inside the markers seems to be an incomplete and unused attempt to set up a test table with a virtual column.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 12, 2025

@ti-chi-bot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-verify 1c381cc link true /test pull-verify
pull-cdc-integration-mysql-test 1c381cc link true /test pull-cdc-integration-mysql-test
pull-cdc-integration-pulsar-test 1c381cc link true /test pull-cdc-integration-pulsar-test
pull-cdc-integration-storage-test 1c381cc link true /test pull-cdc-integration-storage-test
pull-cdc-integration-kafka-test 1c381cc link true /test pull-cdc-integration-kafka-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-7.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-7.5 from a source PR.

2 participants