Skip to content

Better crediting #43

@main-gi

Description

@main-gi

This is not that high of a priority but it's a goal to strive to, after all credit is pretty important.

In the previous game of this company's high score thread, we actually had many scores all across the spectrum in graph form, and in there, solutions obviously discovered by OCD prerelease were uncredited because the contributor was not the first one to get that solution.

yifeixuer got a Cubical Communication 6i score, but that one (though, his solution looks way more elegant :P) was actually tied before. What's your structure for who gets credit? (In theory people could copypaste a score from a steam post to claim themselves as having made it)

(I wouldn't mind giving credit to someone else in the case where the beta tester who got some lowest OCD score doesn't want to come forward though.)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or requestquestionFurther information is requested

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions