Skip to content

Conversation

@dt
Copy link
Contributor

@dt dt commented Nov 1, 2025

Previously, goroutine profiles were collected into two adjacent slices each of length n, with the i'th index of the first holding the captured stack of the i'th goroutine and the i'th index of the second holding its captured labels.

This changes the representation used during collection to be a single slice of length n, with the stack and labels of the i'th goroutine now residing in two fields of each struct in that slice.

Switching from multiple slices each of a single attribute each to one slice of multiple attributes avoids allocating multiple slices, as well as needing to pass them both around, side-by-side, in all goroutine profile collection code. While maintaining and passing two slices was workable -- if perhaps slightly cumbersome -- passing side-by-side around would quickly become unwieldy if or when any additional attributes such as wait reasons or wait times are collected during goroutine profiling, for example as proposed in #74954.

Regardless of the user-facing shape that any such extension to goroutine profiling may end up taking, this updated internal representation should be substantially easier to extend and maintain than side-by-side slices.

This is a pure refactor of this internal representation; it should have no user-facing behavior change.

While in the area: concurrent goroutine collection has been the only mechanism used for some time now, so the disused legacy implementation goroutineProfileWithLabelsSync is removed and the single remaining implementation is renamed to drop its 'concurrent' qualifier.

Updates #74954.

Change-Id: I3fd14834b2f3aae73317d3fad3294d539302713f

Previously, goroutine profiles were collected into two adjacent slices
each of length n, with the i'th index of the first holding the captured
stack of the i'th goroutine and the i'th index of the second holding its
captured labels.

This changes the representation used during collection to be a single
slice of length n, with the stack and labels of the i'th goroutine now
residing in two fields of each struct in that slice.

Switching from multiple slices each of a single attribute each to one
slice of multiple attributes avoids allocating multiple slices, as well
as needing to pass them both around, side-by-side, in all goroutine
profile collection code. While maintaining and passing two slices was
workable -- if perhaps slightly cumbersome -- passing side-by-side around
would quickly become unwieldy if or when any additional attributes such
as wait reasons or wait times are collected during goroutine profiling,
for example as proposed in golang#74954.

Regardless of the user-facing shape that any such extension to goroutine
profiling may end up taking, this updated internal representation should
be substantially easier to extend and maintain than side-by-side slices.

This is a pure refactor of this internal representation; it should have
no user-facing behavior change.

While in the area: concurrent goroutine collection has been the only
mechanism used for some time now, so the disused legacy implementation
goroutineProfileWithLabelsSync is removed and the single remaining
implementation is renamed to drop its 'concurrent' qualifier.

Updates golang#74954.

Change-Id: I3fd14834b2f3aae73317d3fad3294d539302713f
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR (HEAD: 0ae59d2) has been imported to Gerrit for code review.

Please visit Gerrit at https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/717020.

Important tips:

  • Don't comment on this PR. All discussion takes place in Gerrit.
  • You need a Gmail or other Google account to log in to Gerrit.
  • To change your code in response to feedback:
    • Push a new commit to the branch used by your GitHub PR.
    • A new "patch set" will then appear in Gerrit.
    • Respond to each comment by marking as Done in Gerrit if implemented as suggested. You can alternatively write a reply.
    • Critical: you must click the blue Reply button near the top to publish your Gerrit responses.
    • Multiple commits in the PR will be squashed by GerritBot.
  • The title and description of the GitHub PR are used to construct the final commit message.
    • Edit these as needed via the GitHub web interface (not via Gerrit or git).
    • You should word wrap the PR description at ~76 characters unless you need longer lines (e.g., for tables or URLs).
  • See the Sending a change via GitHub and Reviews sections of the Contribution Guide as well as the FAQ for details.
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Gopher Robot:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/717020.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Gopher Robot:

Patch Set 1:

Congratulations on opening your first change. Thank you for your contribution!

Next steps:
A maintainer will review your change and provide feedback. See
https://go.dev/doc/contribute#review for more info and tips to get your
patch through code review.

Most changes in the Go project go through a few rounds of revision. This can be
surprising to people new to the project. The careful, iterative review process
is our way of helping mentor contributors and ensuring that their contributions
have a lasting impact.

During May-July and Nov-Jan the Go project is in a code freeze, during which
little code gets reviewed or merged. If a reviewer responds with a comment like
R=go1.11 or adds a tag like "wait-release", it means that this CL will be
reviewed as part of the next development cycle. See https://go.dev/s/release
for more details.


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/717020.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants