You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Usually any seasoned project has some ongoing refactorings. Tasks that are too big or expensive to complete at once. So, team agrees upon the new direction and writes any new code according to that plan. And when they need modify existing features, they update them too.
This leads to inconsistencies in codebase. Especially in small teams they are not well documented but live as silent knowledge among devs.
What are your suggestions to handle this? I think, the most obvious place would be the constitution. You could describe the problem and the reasoning to change and maybe point out old "bad way" and new "good way".
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Usually any seasoned project has some ongoing refactorings. Tasks that are too big or expensive to complete at once. So, team agrees upon the new direction and writes any new code according to that plan. And when they need modify existing features, they update them too.
This leads to inconsistencies in codebase. Especially in small teams they are not well documented but live as silent knowledge among devs.
What are your suggestions to handle this? I think, the most obvious place would be the constitution. You could describe the problem and the reasoning to change and maybe point out old "bad way" and new "good way".
How have you handled this?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions