-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
Fix PreCommit Java IO Direct Job #36696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix PreCommit Java IO Direct Job #36696
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @aIbrahiim, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a failure in the "javaioPreCommit" job by correcting a module dependency path and standardizing Google Cloud dependencies within the "kafka-factories" module. Additionally, it refines the JMS message consumer's timeout handling to improve reliability. These changes collectively aim to enhance the stability of the build process and the robustness of I/O connectors. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Assigning reviewers: R: @m-trieu for label java. Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment Available commands:
The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments). |
|
It looks like #36099 broke Precommits, please take a look |
|
Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment |
| message = this.consumer.receive(receiveTimeoutMillis); | ||
| } | ||
| long timeout = (receiveTimeoutMillis == 0L) ? 1L : receiveTimeoutMillis; | ||
| message = this.consumer.receive(timeout); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you explain why we need this change? It seems like we are no longer respecting the set receive timeout
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah let's revert JmsIO change. This is a long standing flaky test likely due to test infra (in-memory jms server)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The change was made to address a NullPointerException in JmsIOTest.testCheckpointMarkSafety. When receiveTimeoutMillis was 0, it used consumer.receiveNoWait(), which can return null immediately if no message is available. In the test environment with in memory jms server this led to a race where the test proxy wrapper returned null, causing that NullPointerExption
The fix replaced receiveNoWait() with receive(1L) when the timeout was 0, ensuring a minimal wait that could allow the message to arrive.
However, as @Abacn noted this masks a test infrastructure issue so I will revert it
| dependsOn(":sdks:java:io:jms:build") | ||
| dependsOn(":sdks:java:io:kafka:build") | ||
| dependsOn(":sdks:java:io:kafka:upgrade:build") | ||
| dependsOn(":sdks:java:io:kafka:file-aware-factories:build") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we need to add sdks/java/extensions/kafka-factories to the trigger path of https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.github/workflows/beam_PreCommit_Java_IOs_Direct.yml that's why this wasn't captured
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added
Fixes: #33793
Successful Run: https://github.com/aIbrahiim/beam/actions/runs/18974662014
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>instead.CHANGES.mdwith noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.