Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcuts WP:AFD/TWP:AFD/T WP:AFDTODAYWP:AFDTODAY

1 April 2026

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscernible Unsorted

< March 31	April 02 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Delle navigationi et viaggi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was almost surely created through the use of LLMs. There is an ongoing cleanup thread dedicated to the recent edits of the author of this article on the AI cleanup Wikiproject. The user in the meanwhile has been indef blocked in the main namespace for the usage of LLMs and completely blocked some days ago for their daily evasions with TAs. I've already reverted his other edits, what is left are the articles created by him. There are multiple WP:AISIGNS: In the first version created by the author there were a lot of WP:AIFICTREF (broken external links); there are still multiple signs of WP:AILEGACY (for example revealing their close friendship and intellectual exchange or demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of geography and global economic dynamics) that are completely missing in the sources; and finally there are facts that are simply absent in the sources that should reference them, such as the fact that the geographic maps were produced together with Gastaldi or the fact that Ramusio's work influenced the works of de Bry and Purchas (both facts are actually true, but they come from this source and not from the one used in that part of the article, which is this one). According to Copyleaks it was 100% AI-made (whilst according to GPTZero it's a mix of AI- and human-generated text, but I remind that these tools are not always reliable). All in all, I think that's a pretty straightforward violation of WP:NEWLLM and that the best course of action is WP:TNT. --Friniate ✉ 14:32, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Geography, Suspected AI-generated articles, and Italy. --Friniate ✉ 14:34, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looks to be largely an llm translation from it.wiki including the same references "retrieved" long before the page existed on en.wiki. Incidentally I have noticed that this phenomena is becoming more common - editors add a new page with a large diff which includes references which have been lifted wholesale from another language wiki. Even if they are curating the content, at very least they are not carefully verifying the references. JMWt (talk) 14:48, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nezar Kadhem

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most sources in this article cover the app rather than the person himself, which does not establish personal notability per WP:BIO. فيصل (talk) 14:12, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bahrain. فيصل (talk) 14:12, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistani occupation of Paktika province

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not widely attested to in WP:RS sources, nor do any of the sources claim that the entirety of the province had been occupied (as the title of the article erroneously suggests), only a sliver of 32 kilometers. Noorullah (talk) 13:50, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 13:55, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This article doesn't claim that all of Paktika province is occupied, the map is just a filler until an invasion map is made. JaxsonR (talk) 14:32, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Map has been removed, I'm hoping for an invasion map soon. JaxsonR (talk) 14:50, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Philpott

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I redirected this page to Rubyhorse; page creator reverted. I do not see a credible claim to independent notability' Seeking a broader consensus. TheLongTone (talk) 13:46, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Ireland. Shellwood (talk) 13:54, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Shelly Kittleson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:1EVENT applies to this page as I cannot find any sources before yesterday and today. shane (talk to me if you want!) 13:42, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Iraq, and United States of America. shane (talk to me if you want!) 13:42, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Although its true that the notable for just an event case applies, however the event itself has grown significantly notable. Changing the name of the article to something like Kidnapping of Shelly Kittleson or something would be better. Tribol (talk) 14:39, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yousef Alhorr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most sources in this article cover the organization (GORD) rather than the person himself, which does not establish personal notability per WP:BIO. فيصل (talk) 13:33, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Qatar. فيصل (talk) 13:33, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kenny McCormick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Delete because he was run over by cows. ^{[April Fools!]} ArtopiaBoy (talk) 13:20, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ArtopiaBoy (talk) 13:20, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Due to the undisputed notability of cows and aliens, and Kenny's intense connection to that topic, an exception to WP:NOTINHERITED should be made in this specific case. ^{[April Fools!]} Daranios (talk) 14:07, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment per WP:YOUBASTARDS. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and recreate daily Elemimele (talk) 14:36, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Western Coal Field

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only the "Kentucky: A Guide to the Bluegrass State" book seems to define this term, and even then it dedicates only a paragraph. The PDF "Kentucky Coal Facts" drops the term "Western Coal Field" a couple times but fails to define what it is. Extensive WP:BEFORE on newspapers.com, GBooks, and archive.org found almost nothing but false positives for random coal fields in western Kentucky, without a single source clearly defining this as a verifiable region. Compare Jackson Purchase, which has multiple sources clearly defining it as a region and expanding on its history.

The first non-Wikipedia hit on Google is a page from the Kentucky Paleontological Society that does not appear to have been updated in decades, and the second is a PDF that only uses the term "Western Coal Field" in its footnotes. That the first two hits are so obscure is really telling. I found a few sources using the term "Western Coal Field", but most of them are books that are close to a century old, and outside the 1939 book already cited, none define the region.

It's possible there's some authoritative geographic source out there that I'm missing or don't have access to, but if this is to be kept, it massively needs WP:TNT or a merge/redirect to a related topic. I feel like some of the other geographical regions of Kentucky should be looked at too, as most of them are sorely lacking in sources, but one thing at a time. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:15, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Kentucky. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:15, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mia Zachary

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not be enough here for WP:AUTHOR KH-1 (talk) 12:22, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, and United States of America. – The Grid (talk) 12:28, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Christelle Nkwendja-Ngnoubamdjum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear if there's enough for WP:NBIO/GNG KH-1 (talk) 12:00, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 12:16, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

VConnect

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization. Zuck28 (talk) 07:33, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, Technology, Internet, Ghana, and Nigeria. Zuck28 (talk) 07:33, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It is not evident that a WP:BEFORE was done here, I see a clear WP:GNG pass from the Business Day and Techpoint Africa sources I found. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:20, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 11:41, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Energy Innovation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. I cannot find a single reliable source that mentions the organization. I₂Overcome ^talk 08:34, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. I₂Overcome ^talk 08:34, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California and Organizations. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 10:16, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Multiple source such as The New York Times and The Los Angeles Times are cited in this article, these sources seem to be reliable per the perennial sources list. I believe this article needs some work to remove the promotional nature of its prose, but good sources can be found, so notability criteria are satisfied. A quick Google search gives me plenty of results. Qwerty123M (talk) 11:32, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell, only the Axios article you added as further reading and the Yahoo news article actually mention this organization. I was not able to find any relevant results with a Google search; what other sources did you find? I₂Overcome ^talk 21:11, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have found another source that I added to further reading but I suspect that was generated at least partially by AI since the presented facts seem quite basic and is written in a monotonous way. I could not find much beyond this though.

If we must only use a few sources that directly mention the company, then we should significantly cut back the scale of this article. Qwerty123M (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 11:41, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alessia Merzlova

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed drafification; WP:DRAFTOBJECT applies. WP:ADMASQ for a WP:ROTM 'international fashion model'. Fancruft. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:25, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Women. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:42, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:43, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: France, Germany, Australia, and United States of America. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:43, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was speedy delete per G5 by Hey man im josh. (non-admin closure) Shellwood (talk) 13:18, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Atikur Rahman Mahy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It was a draft and the submission was declined: "Submission is about a person not yet shown to meet notability guidelines and v - Submission is improperly sourced". Then it was moved to the main space by its creator. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 11:19, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, and Bangladesh. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 11:19, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:NACTOR. Only a single reference is present, and not a WP:42 one. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:30, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt – the creator is an obvious sockpuppet (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mahichowdhury20) but is not yet blocked, so G5 doesn't apply just yet. As for the article, note that his name is actually spelt Mahi, but the title Atikur Rahman Mahi has been salted and page creations involving that spelling have been blacklisted following heavy spamming so this is WP:GAMING to get around that protection. He is not notable per WP:NMUSIC, WP:NACTOR or WP:BASIC, and he and/or people paid by him have tried to shoehorn his biography into Wikipedia for a long time. --bonadea contributions talk 11:46, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonadea It is blocked now. Mehedi Abedin 11:55, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Arham Islam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Falls under WP:TOOSOON? Has represented Bangladesh and Australia at the youth levels. Delete/draftify before senior debut. X (talk) 11:05, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Football, Bangladesh, and Australia. X (talk) 11:05, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:15, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Katie Craig (artist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Katie Craig does not meet WP:GNG. All the sources used fail WP:RS, some are interviews, but most are related to her commercial galleries and PR. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 06:33, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Arts, and Visual arts. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 06:33, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Note that this has been tagged as a potential WP:NBIO failure since May 2025 (after having been created that March). No opinion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Harden

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails to meet the General Notability Guideline due to the absence of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. A detailed review of all cited references shows that none provide the level of independent, in-depth coverage required.

Fastcompany COI- He is a writer at Fastcompany (https://www.fastcompany.com/1351087/what-i-learned-restroom-t%C3%AAte-%C3%A0-t%C3%AAte-george-nelson).

Wall Street Journal (WSJ)- Written by a freelance contributor, not staff, focuses on his residence/lifestyle, not professional impact and lacks depth and relevance to encyclopedic notability.

Associated Press (AP News)- Mentions Harden only briefly within a broader topic. Does not provide substantive biographical detail, passing mentions are insufficient.

Good Design (good-design.org)- Organizational profile / award listing, likely affiliated or primary source and provides routine biographical information only.

Global Design News- Interview-based content, involves direct subject participation, reducing independence and lacks analytical or third-party depth. Rudshoyes (talk) 05:35, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Rudshoyes (talk) 05:35, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 09:45, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Visual arts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:55, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Nomination is clearly written by an LLM. See WP:AILIST. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 11:57, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Asriel

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDICT. Star walker (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
At the very least, this stub should be draftified. Star walker (talk) 06:41, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If consensus is to not keep, I would suggest redirecting to Asriel (disambiguation) or even moving the disambiguation page to Asriel. (apologies for the April Fools signature.) ❤ crash // organhaver ( i'm blue now | PLEASE talk to me ) 05:21, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

How is this a NOTDICT? it’s a person. Hyperbolick (talk) 05:30, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The first nomination is a (concurrent, no less) April Fools nomination from the same nominator; I can't say I've seen that before. (No opinion on the article.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:58, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bible and Judaism. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:58, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:GNG via Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary/Jewish Encyclopedia coverage of Edom's kings. It follows precedent for biblical stubs and it's expandable with Ellicott/Cambridge sources. Deletion would fragments genealogy as mentioned and linked to in wiki articles. LumenArchivorum (talk) 14:39, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Geordie Lishman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet the WP:GNG or the specific notability criteria for artists WP:ARTIST. While Geordie Lishman has produced public artworks and has a professional career, there is insufficient evidence of in-depth coverage about the individual in independent publications including major news outlets, art journals, or critical reviews. Page also read as a résumé-style listing rather than an encyclopedic summary supported by independent analysis, raising concerns under WP:PROMO. Rudshoyes (talk) 04:37, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Rudshoyes (talk) 04:37, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Canada. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 08:32, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I have significantly updated the article to address the concerns regarding WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. The subject has received significant, in-depth coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources that establish notability beyond his familial ties:

National Media & Critical Reception: The subject's installation The Rock People was the focus of a national debate on public art covered by the National Post (2013), providing the "independent analysis" requested by the nominator.

Institutional Validation: Lishman's collaboration with the Pickering Museum Village on the Forging ON project (2024), funded by Digital Museums Canada, demonstrates high-level professional standing and institutional trust.

Sustained Local Impact: He has been commissioned for multiple permanent municipal landmarks (Ajax, Pickering, Ontario Tech University) over a 15-year period, with coverage in INdurham and Durham Region News regarding his recent 2024/2025 commissions.

The article has been rewritten to remove the "résumé-style" tone and now focuses on documented public impact and reception. Legendaryrob (talk) 15:28, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I also pulled up sources 5 and 7, which are RS. The "overweight" statue issue has some coverage in other news outlets [1], which should be enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:40, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You I hope they keep it. Legendaryrob (talk) 05:09, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Oaktree b, Quick evaluation of 5 & 7:

5. Forging ON – Blacksmithing as an Art Form:

This is a museum/educational website (Pickering Museum / Digital Museums Canada).

It provides primary/descriptive content, e.g. noting that Geordie Lishman continues his father’s artistic legacy.

Issue: It is not independent analysis or significant coverage, more of an exhibit-style narrative.

7. Robert McLaughlin Gallery tag page

This is effectively a directory/tag aggregation page.

It does not provide substantial editorial coverage, just listings. Rudshoyes (talk) 05:42, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EmilyR34 (talk) 04:55, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Doom Inc

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:CORP. Cannot find significant coverage from reliable independent sources. Popcornfud (talk) 04:12, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Popcornfud (talk) 04:12, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Music, Television, Advertising, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Government College of Arts and Science, Aurangabad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 11:10, 16 March 2026 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because they also fail WP:NSCHOOL and GNG,. often only with single sources for the entire page[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Maharashtra. Shellwood (talk) 12:49, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Government College of Arts and Science – Redirect to Aurangabad#Education

Government Institute of Science – Redirect to Aurangabad#Education
S.B.E.S. College of Science – Redirect to Aurangabad#Education
Shivchhatrapati College – Keep - Found borderline SIGCOV in some Marathi language articles.
Yogeshwari Mahavidyalaya – Redirect to Ambajogai#Education
Dr. (Sow.) Indirabai Bhaskarrao Pathak Mahila Kala Mahavidyalaya – Redirect to Aurangabad#Education
Vasantrao Naik Mahavidyalaya – Redirect to Aurangabad#Education BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:24, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Science. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:28, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with above assessment by user:Spiderone, all redirects except one keep for Shivchhatrapati College. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 23:24, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:22, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The discussion currently leans toward a mix of redirects with a single Keep for Shivchhatrapati College based on borderline coverage. To reach a firm consensus, it would be helpful for participants to provide or evaluate specific Marathi-language sources to determine if they constitute SIGCOV.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EmilyR34 (talk) 03:48, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ripio

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been at AFD twice and then DRV. The first AFD I closed as keep but during AFD2 it was revealed that the first AFD had been irretrievably tainted by sockpuppetry. The second AFD however focused on the process of opening a second AFD too soon so wasn't the right vehicle for a clean discussion. I therefore closed both discussions with a view to relisting for a clean discussion once the dust has settled. DRV endorsed this approach although my language in the second close could have been better. So after all that, here we are. This is an administrative listing so I take no position. Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:38, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Argentina, and Companies. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 09:48, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Roblox oof

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not convinced that this is worthy of a standalone article. WP:NOPAGE recommends that an article not be created on a topic if the topic would be better understood with context from related articles, and I think that everything conveyed here either can be or already is adequately covered within the articles on Roblox, Messiah (video game), Tommy Tallarico, and Hbomberguy, where the context given by those articles better aids understanding. There's just not much meat here nor any real hope for expansion, and I think the most appropriate thing to do would be to merge this article to a new subsection of Roblox#Community and culture. silviaASH (inquire within) 03:16, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Entertainment, Law, Popular culture, and Internet. silviaASH (inquire within) 03:16, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have no opinion on this article, but I strongly oppose making this a dedicated sub-section of the Roblox article. Roblox is a large platform with so much to cover that it should only focus on giving detailed attention to the important things. The "oof" sound, no matter how much of a meme as it may have been, is not a subject that is prevalent enough to greater Roblox history as far as a non-fancruft, encyclopedic overview should be concerned. It would not be due. The coverage of the sound effect in that section right now (a couple sentences) is more than enough. λ NegativeMP1 03:43, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: I agree with both the nominator and @NMP1. The sound effect has coverage in reliable sources, but a standalone page makes less sense than simply a few lines of explanation in a larger article. Both NOPAGE and DUE are relevant here. This content should be merged somewhere, but not as a dedicated section. 11WB (talk) 03:57, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the topic would not be worth a subsection in Roblox's article, it's three sentences are probably pushing it. In Hbomberguy's article, it is currently one monstrously long sentence, but I don't think there's any more encyclopedic prose to be drawn from it (he did a video on this topic, sources report he did a video, they don't say anything about its impact). In Tallarico's article, it is covered well and throughout, making it a viable merge target--except for the fact that it is an awful article for someone to land upon when looking it up; we'd literally be targeting it to somebody who has nothing to do with it. In Messiah's article, it is obviously not an important part of the game's legacy and all that can really be said is it originated their. In short, I don't think Messiah is a possible merge target (the sound comes from it... that's it), nor HBomberguy (he made a video where it was the title), Tallarico would be a confusing target (he said he had something to do with it, sources talk about someone saying he didn't), and in Roblox I don't see any context about the sound needed other than it is a video game platform. I think the best solution to not having three articles where it is relevant give a few sentence summations, is a brief summation and a link to this article. It's unlikely a reader looking at Messiah will be looking for talk of Roblox, it's unlikely that a reader of Hbomberguy will be looking for a ton of info on one video essay he did, it's unlikely a reader of Roblox should care about Tallarico or Harris or Messiah, and Tallarico is a weird target as mentioned above. 1brianm7 (talk) 04:56, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I agree with 1brianm7's overall conclusion here: having one page rather than multiple partially overlapping summaries is better organization. I do think Messiah would actually be the least bad merge/redirect target, as that appears to be the least misleading option historically speaking, and the sound originating from there makes it part of that game's legacy, maybe even the primary reason the game is remembered today. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 06:13, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. If this topic was more closely tied to one specific area, then maybe it'd make sense to merge as a subtopic. But this would be way too much detail in the main Roblox article (a quite notable topic), and isn't really a good fit for Tommy Talarico, Messiah, or Hbomberguy. It can just be a short, independent article on the nexus of all 4. SnowFire (talk) 14:38, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

SUNY Online

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely WP:PROMOTIONAL article for SUNY's online learning systems. Comment on talk page from 2007 states "this article is nothing more than a C&P from SLN's (SUNY Learning Networks) promo material." Expansion since then is either unsourced or sourced to SUNY materials, with the exception of only two sentences sourced to the AP and NYT. If subject is notable, article needs to be fundamentally rewritten to be encyclopedic. —BrechtBro (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and New York. —BrechtBro (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to SUNY article. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:51, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - my reason for deprodding was "Notable program of a public state university." Is it WP:TNT? Really? Disclosure: I'm a graduate of SUNY. Bearian (talk) 21:51, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect- to State University of New York and have verifiable info from here and be added to the Redirect target article, spot checks on current sources and additional searches do show strong presence online, but have yet to see SIGCOV featuring their online program specifically, not opposed to draftify if author can improve the writing and sources to demonstrate enough notability.Lorraine Crane (talk) 01:23, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:55, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tino Puentes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't seem to find any WP:SIGCOV on this player. Everything I'm seeing are transfer notices and WP:LOCAL reports from the club's website. To my eye, this players fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC at the moment. Anwegmann (talk) 14:47, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 14:47, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and New Jersey. Shellwood (talk) 15:00, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I think this nomination is rushed. From our critics' view, the quantity of sources is acceptable. The quality of sources here is subjective: while technically local, the sources are literally from The Big Apple. Furthermore, the season has just begun: the next home game is March 28, this week, when the subject will have an opportunity to start. While Transfermarkt is a notoriously unreliable source, and there are false positive hits, the subject has gotten more attention in the media lately. Bearian (talk) 18:13, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Which sources represent WP:SIGCOV that is not WP:LOCAL or transfer announcements? There are none cited in the article, and you haven't provided any.

This simply announces his signing alongside several others.

This is essentially identical to the one above, simply announcing his signing alongside several others.

This is a partial interview that focuses solely on his debut alongside several others.

I don't see how any of these come close to WP:SIGCOV. At best, you're making an argument for WP:TOOSOON. We're not in the business of writing articles for things that will be notable in some imagined future. Anwegmann (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not asking for an imaged future. I'm asking for 3 days. Bearian (talk) 01:56, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I found a recent (2026) interview but it's just an interview. I'm holding out, for a couple of days, based on pattern recognition and not on any insider information, for coverage this week. If not, then at least we tried. I'm not perfect; my record at AfD is about 96% correct. Bearian (talk) 17:01, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I have provided various sources to demonstrate he is notable. Also, the season had just begun and the player will get additional coverage. Elopez76 (talk)
You have not done that. Anwegmann (talk) 19:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there does not appear to be any SIGCOV of Puentes. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 01:32, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 14:30, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 14:35, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:53, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Frutina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not overly notable, most of the coverage seems to come from its acquisition by Slush Puppie. Could be a redirect to a section on that article. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 10:26, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or redirect. Improve don't remove. No need for overall deletion of this article.Pluribussin' (talk) 10:32, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
In and of itself that does not address questions surrounding the notability of the subject. No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. (That said, I have no opinion as to whether the notability issue here can be overcome.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion Was a major brand of the 1990s and 2000s, found in many leisure places. Will provide more sources. Icaldonta (talk) 13:13, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If anything, the acquisition by Slush Puppie shows it was a distinct company/brand worth acquiring. The sources already included in the article mention competitive market context, but most importantly, the strategic importance of the Frutina deal. Icaldonta (talk) 19:52, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to highlight this source outlining its importance in the school market:

https://www.talkingretail.com/products-news/slush-puppie-expands-frutina-product-range-27-03-2013/?utm_source=chatgpt.com Icaldonta (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This subject doesn’t inherit notability just because it was acquired by a notable company, see WP:NCORP. It must be proven to be notable in its own right.

It also doesn’t become notable just because it was popular or widespread.

I also think that source you provided doesn’t really represent WP:SIGCOV of Frutina as it’s more about what Slush Puppie were doing with the brand. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 23:44, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have had a look into sources and it is difficult as Frutina appeared to drop off after the Slush Puppie deal, as Slush Puppie became the more popular name. The 1990s and 2000s sources at the height of its popularity are not as readily available as 2010s articles we have.

Is is possible Frutina would be a sub-section on another article in a worst-case scenario? Icaldonta (talk) 23:09, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, in my original AfD nomination above I stated it could become a redirect to a section on the Slush Puppie article where I think it's warranted. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 01:44, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Being widespread and popular literally ARE the definition of notable. Of course notability is not inherited, and it isn't being inherited here, but the subject is notable in its own right.

Sof1a510 (talk) 23:36, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:39, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Silvester Wayiti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably not enough for WP:N. Nothing beyond routine coverage of appointment. KH-1 (talk) 09:39, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Engineering, and Africa. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:58, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - poorly sourced. Two of the sources are from a single media outlet, and the other two are press releases ("reporter" is the dead giveaway). So one citation is not enough for a BLP. Ping me if you add more. Bearian (talk) 21:32, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - there are two citations from The Namibian, not one. The citations are in relation to two different appointments and authored by two different journalists. Sure, they are both from a single media outlet - but it's the biggest English-language newspaper in the country. Given the context of existing WP:Systemic bias - our coverage of Namibia is relatively meagre - I vote keep. Dsp13 (talk) 19:59, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really SIGCOV though. Of the two articles in the Nambian, this is just a three sentence overview of his appointment and previous roles, and the other is just a passing mention [2].-KH-1 (talk) 00:08, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Agree those aren't very extended (though CEO of NORED is an important job). But this in New Era Live is actually an interview, rather than just a press release. Dsp13 (talk) 22:49, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:38, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The sources provided fail to meet the requirements for significant coverage. The articles in The Namibian are indeed routine announcements of professional appointments which according to WP:ROUTINE do not establish notability. Even the interview in New Era Live while more detailed remains a primary source based on the subjects own words rather than an independent analysis of his career. Being a CEO of a regional utility is a significant professional achievement but it does not automatically translate to encyclopedic notability without sustained independent coverage. Xoonkowa (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Perumal Engineering College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced for 15 years. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 01:37, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Engineering, and Tamil Nadu. LibStar (talk) 01:37, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of colleges affiliated to the Anna University as an ATD-R. BhikhariInformer (talk) 01:46, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of colleges affiliated to the Anna University, there seem to be a lot of these coming up here, there was a bundled nom of similar articles a few days ago. ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 09:28, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha scale

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails Wikipedia's notability criteria. There has not been significant coverage in reliable sources of Wendy Carlos' invented scale. The article has 5 sources, 2 of which are by Carlos. More importantly, the article is a hash of original research and clumsy prose that is not at all suitable for our target audience: the general reader. It does more harm than good to have an article this inept at Wikipedia. Trumpetrep (talk) 03:38, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Trumpetrep (talk) 03:38, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, what independent sourcing is there looks reasonably solid, especially the Milano article. On top of that, I'm finding at least a bit more coverage, such as this paper (arxiv link here), which extends the work a bit. Also here's a paper talking about composing a piece with the scale. With that said, I think a merge with beta scale and gamma scale would be appropriate, given how similar they all are, and all devised by Carlos. It's a niche topic, but there's at least some stuff out there. We cover plenty of niche topics, and if there's any improvement to the "clumsy" prose to make, that's fixable with normal editing. The claims of OR are more significant, but it would help to see more concrete examples. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 04:15, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, a merge would be a good solution to the problem. Trumpetrep (talk) 13:53, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Merge this, Beta scale, and Gamma scale into some article titled Carlos scales or something. the Doug hole (a crew 4 life) 19:14, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed with above: merge this, Beta scale, and Gamma scale to a new page (Carlos scales or Carlos tunings sounds fine). The content should not be deleted, as there is a body of work that shows the scales are notable as a whole. I'll include a little list below for anyone interested. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 20:27, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- Benson, Dave. '6 - More scales and temperaments'. Music: A Mathematical Offering by Dave Benson, 1st edn, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 210–244. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511811722.
- Carlos, Wendy. 'Three Asymmetric Divisions of the Octave'. Wendy Carlos. https://www.wendycarlos.com/resources/pitch.html. Accessed 24 Mar. 2026.
- Carlos, Wendy. ‘Tuning: At the Crossroads’. Computer Music Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, 1987, p. 29. doi:10.2307/3680176.
- Milano, Dominic. 'A Many-Colored Jungle Of Exotic Tunings' Keyboard, 1986. https://www.wendycarlos.com/other/PDF-Files/Kbd86Tunings*.pdf.
- Sewell, Amanda. ‘The Last of the New (1985–1997)’. Wendy Carlos, by Amanda Sewell, 1st edn, Oxford University Press, 2020, pp. 151–80. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190053468.003.0008.
- Sills, Andrew V. ‘Generalized Carlos Scales’. Journal of Mathematics and Music, vol. 19, no. 3, Sept. 2025, pp. 243–49. doi:10.1080/17459737.2025.2568834.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:31, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

comment: My feeling is that most respondents agree these scales are all, in some way, notable, and should not be deleted; it's just that everyone thinks it would be sensible to present them to the reader in one place as a whole, rather than split them up, and there's a general flavour that they are more obviously notable as a group than individually. Merge is therefore a great outcome, but if no one gets round to merging, keep is better than delete. (I wish the advocates of bus-stops would also grasp the concept that sometimes one overarching article is better than a plethora of repetitive mini-articles) Elemimele (talk) 10:15, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Galdan Boshugtu Khan's expeditions against the Kazakh Khanate (1681–1684)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As noted on the article talkpage and this ANI discussion, there is no available sourcing explicitly supporting the idea that this series of skirmishes was a discrete part of the Kazakh-Dzungar Wars, to which I suggest a merge. Pinging above-mentioned users @CoffeeCrumbs and Онеми:. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:08, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Mongolia, Central Asia, and Kazakhstan. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:08, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Although stated as conquest of cities by Haines R. Spencer and series of expeditions by Vasily Barthold and Bai Cuiqin, I agree for the merge to Dzungar Khanate (for the internal imrpovement of the Dzungar Khanate) and the Kazakh–Dzungar Wars, IsHorse, the Khan of the Universe and Ungulates (Please don't click this) 10:16, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

~~Galdan Boshugtu Khan page too. IsHorse, the Khan of the Universe and Ungulates (Please don't click this) 10:21, 9 March 2026 (UTC)~~[reply]

Comment Striking sock. Servite et contribuere (talk) 12:02, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:10, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If sources have been discovered, then Kazakh–Dzungar Wars should be improved first. Orientls (talk) 01:16, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:20, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:26, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not seem to be useful as a distinct article. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 06:55, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Kazakh-Dzungar Wars per PAGEDECIDE, as Orientls says, this could improve the destination article, outright deletion would be wrong here since we would be losing good work and sources (even if it was a sock, some if could still useful) ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 09:17, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

State University of New York North

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass GNG. Program ended in 2019. There is detailed information available at SUNY Oswego's website[3], but my searches are not showing any independent SIGCOV. —BrechtBro (talk) 16:46, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Education, Schools, and New York. —BrechtBro (talk) 16:46, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:26, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable defunct university consortium. I was going to say that notability isn't temporary, but I can't find evidence that this ever met GNG. ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 09:09, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a defunct administrative listing that lacks independent and significant coverage. The current page is essentially a directory of colleges without any encyclopedic context. Since it fails the criteria for notability it does not warrant a separate article. Xoonkowa (talk) 13:21, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Picture Telephone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be an obscure video game website with little coverage. A few forum posts. Comparisons between it and other games, telephone games. Jay Is Games published 2 reviews of it.

Fails WP:NWEB Cognsci (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Cognsci (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No additional sources found with a WP:BEFORE check. Few sources in the article actually relate to the website and the other sources are not significant enough to warrant an article on it. Nagol0929 (talk) 00:54, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak keep~~Comment. The PC Gamer mention as a top 100 website in 2009; this book which talk about the game at length:

[4]

This article mentions the game in a context that could be useful to improving the article, but does not convey notability:

[5]

Trade Journal article about 5 web-based games including this one, but I don't have access to the full text:

[6]

Revolving Doormat (talk) 20:24, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:19, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Zamia oligodonta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

LLM-generated in violation of WP:NOLLM, according to the author’s disclosure on the talk page. The author is experienced and claims to have verified all the sources. Should an exception be made, or should the article be deleted in accordance with the guideline? I₂Overcome ^talk 00:27, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology, Suspected AI-generated articles, and Colombia. I₂Overcome ^talk 00:27, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There was no absolute prohibition on using LLMs in creating an article at the time I created it. I even posted about it in the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 209#AI SEO. I had reviewed all of the text and confirmed all of the citations before moving it into main space. This nomination is trying to apply subsequent changes to the policy retroactively. - Donald Albury 01:59, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are some WP:CLOP issues, including but not limited to (I only checked one source):

Caption
Article	Source (the Caljone one)
The specific epithet oligodonta derives from the Greek roots oligo (few) and odonto (teeth), referring to the small number of teeth present in the apical region of each leaflet	The specific epithet is derived from the greek roots oligo (few) and odonto (=teeth), in allusion to the presence of a few teeth in the apical region of each leaflet
Deforested areas of otherwise suitable habitat confirm that the species is in decline	deforested areas of otherwise suitable habitat suggest that the species is declining
Zamia oligodonta is endemic to the department of Risaralda in western Colombia, where it grows in premontane rainforest on the Pacific slope of the Western Cordillera at elevations of 1,500 to 1,800 metres above sea level	Zamia oligodonta is endemic to the department of Risaralda, where it occurs in premontane rain forests (sensu Holdridge 1967) on the Western Cordillera at elevations between 1500 to 1800 m.
Fertile seed strobili at different stages of maturity have been recorded in at least two populations, indicating that sexual reproduction is ongoing	Fertile seed strobili at different stages of maturity have been observed in two populations, indicating that reproduction is occurring normally

NEWLLM still applies here as at the time it prohibits generate new Wikipedia articles from scratch, and the LLM disclosure indicates that was what happened, even if manual editing was done afterwards. Jumpytoo Talk 02:29, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(plus a change in meaning, "suggest that the species is declining" is not the same thing as "confirm that the species is in decline")

but wow, that's way more verbatim than I would have expected from that prompt Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:25, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and WP:TNT per Jumpytoo. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 05:23, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify. I think the option should be left open for someone to perform an AIless rewrite of this article from the available sources if they so wish. Athanelar (talk) 08:29, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify I can see the argument for TNT here, but TNT also clearly states that you don't need to go through AFD to start over on an article and I think that keeping the sources which were checked by a person for reuse in a future article makes sense. The subject itself seems to meet notability requirements so fully deleting the article doesn't make sense to me. ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 09:01, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]