Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Flat lesions in CT colonography

  • Published:
Save article
View saved research
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flat lesions have been a source of controversy because of concerns that CT colonography (CTC) is insensitive in detecting these lesions, yet they may harbor a high incidence of advanced neoplasia. The wide variation in the reported incidence of flat lesions may in part be due to the lack of a uniform definition of “flat”, and in fact in many prior reports the inclusion criteria for flat are not even clearly specified. Emphasis on the more recent CTC literature suggests that when limited the target lesion to neoplasia (adenomas or adenocarcinoma), the incidence of flat lesions is low and most can be detected by CTC. Using fecal tagging and careful attention to the proper methods of searching for flat lesions with both 3D and 2D techniques can maximize the detection of flat lesions at CTC. Computer-aided detection may be helpful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Ross AS, Waxman I (2006) Flat and depressed neoplasms of the colon in Western populations. Am J Gastroenterol 101:172–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A, et al. (2000) Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 355(9211):1211–1214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E, et al. (2002) Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 51:550–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sawada T, Hojo K, Moriya Y (1989) Colonoscopic management of focal and early colorectal carcinoma. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol 3:627–645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Soetikno R, Friedland S, Kaltenbach T, et al. (2006) Nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms. Gastroenterology 130(2):566–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hurlstone DP, Karajeh M, Sanders DS, et al. (2005) Rectal aberrant crypt foci identified using high-magnification-chromoscopic colonoscopy: biomarkers for flat and depressed neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 100(6):1283–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kudo S, Kashida H, Nakajima T, et al. (1997) Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer. World J Surg 21:694–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kudo S, Kashida H, Tamura T, et al. (2000) Colonoscopic diagnosis and management of nonpolypoid early colorectal cancer. World J Surg 24(9):1081–1090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon. Gastrointest Endosc 58(Suppl 6):S3–S43 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, et al. (2004) Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. AJR 183:1343–1347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gluecker TM, Fletcher JG, Welch TJ, et al. (2004) Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method. AJR 182(4):881–889

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236:3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Robbins J, Pickhardt P, Kim D (2009) Flat (nonpolypoid) lesions at CT colonography: imaging and histologic characteristics using a new morphologic definition [Abstract]. Annual Meeting of the ARRS. Boston, MA

  14. Lostumbo A, Tsai J, Suzuki K, et al. (2009) Comparison of 2D and 3D views for evaluation of flat lesions in CT colonography. Acad Radiol (in press)

  15. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ (2007) Characteristics of advanced adenomas detected at CT colonographic screening: implications for appropriate polyp size thresholds for polypectomy versus surveillance. AJR 188(4):940–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anonymous (1983) General rules for the clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. Part I. Clinical classification. Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Jpn J Surg 13:557–573

  17. Anonymous (1983) General rules for the clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. Part II. Histopathological classification. Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Jpn J Surg 13:574–598

  18. Park SH, Lee SS, Choi EK, et al. (2007) Flat colorectal neoplasms: definition, importance, and visualization on CT colonography. AJR 188:953–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fidler J, Johnson C (2009) Flat polyps of the colon: accuracy of detection by CT colonography and histologic significance. Abdom Imaging 34:157–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fidler JL, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, et al. (2002) Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 27:292–300

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Silva AC, Wellnitz CV, Hara AK (2006) Three-dimensional virtual dissection at CT colonography: unraveling the colon to search for lesions. Radiographics 26(6):1669–1686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, et al. (2004) Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography. Acad Radiol 11(7):750–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mang TG, Schaefer-Prokop C, Maier A, et al. (2005) Detectability of small and flat polyps in MDCT colonography using 2D and 3D imaging tools: results from a phantom study. AJR 185(6):1582–1589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park SH, Ha HK, Kim MJ, et al. (2005) False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions. Radiology 235(2):495–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson DC, Mei-Hsiu C, Toledano AY, et al. (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359(12):1207–1217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Young BM, Fletcher JG, Paulsen SR, et al. (2007) Polyp measurement with CT colonography: Multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison. AJR 188(1):122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Park SH, Ha HK, Kim AY, et al. (2006) Flat polyps of the colon: detection with 16-MDCT colonography—preliminary results. AJR 186:1611–1617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Morimoto T, Iinuma G, Shiraishi J, et al. (2008) Computer-aided detection in computed tomography colonography: current status and problems with detection of early colorectal cancer. Radiat Med 26(5):261–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Summers RM, Frentz SM, Liu J, et al. (2009) Conspicuity of colorectal polyps at CT colonography: visual assessment, CAD performance, and the important role of polyp height. Acad Radiol 16(1):4–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor SA, Suzuki N, Beddoe G, et al. (2009) Flat neoplasia of the colon: CT colonography with CAD. Abdom Imaging 34:173–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rockey D, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365:305–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Suzuki K, Sheu I, Rockey CD, et al. (2009) A CAD utilizing 3D massive-training ANNs for detection of flat lesions in CT colonography: preliminary results. Proc SPIE 7260:72601A1–72601A7

    Google Scholar 

  33. Suzuki K, Yoshida H, Nappi J, Armato SG III, Dachman AH (2008) Mixture of expert 3D massive-training ANNs for reduction of multiple types of false positives in CAD for detection of polyps in CT colonography. Med Phys 35:694–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Park SH, Kim SY, Lee SS (2009) Sensitivity of CT colonography for nonpolypoid colorectal lesions interpreted by human readers and with computer-aided detection. AJR 193:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Antonella Lostumbo

    Present address: Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, MC 2026, University of Chicago Hospitals, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA

    Antonella Lostumbo, Kenji Suzuki & Abraham H. Dachman

Authors
  1. Antonella Lostumbo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenji Suzuki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abraham H. Dachman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abraham H. Dachman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lostumbo, A., Suzuki, K. & Dachman, A.H. Flat lesions in CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 35, 578–583 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9562-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9562-3

Key words